Do you believe A) lowering the speed limit on roads will reduce accidents even though a lower speed limit can cause more congestion and force cars closer together thus causing more rear end collisions or B) Leave the speed limits alone (providing the surrounding area doesn't require a lower speed) and educate drivers better? Let me explain what I mean by this. Your typical teen gets their permit at 15. I don't know the entire country's requirements for teens but I know by me, the teen needs to complete a certain number of hours on the road before getting their licenses. They also have driver's ed in school and spend maybe an hour a day or even a week with an actual driving teacher for only a couple of weeks. So, most teens learn to driver by their parents. What makes a typical parent a good driving teacher? And I'm not slamming parenting ability. I believe every driver on the road has acquired at least one bad habit if not more in the way they drive which the new teen driver is going to pick up as well. So basically, the are picking up bad habits even before they get their license. Cost and lack of experience by the teen aside, do you think teens should be required to have more time on the road with a licensed driving teacher and have to get experience in all driving conditions (meaning wet, sun, nite or snow)? Would you be willing to pay more to teach your teen to be a good driver or are you willing to accept the basic drivers ed class and assume the job is good enough? Depending on the answers I get, I'll edit this with the reason I'm asking.
Tags: