Peace Loving Leftist?

Question

So, 8,000 to 10,000 took to the streets. Many destroyed property, started fires and blocked roads...All while wearing rags to hide their faces like domestic terrorist.

Is this the Peace and Love that the left wants for America? Is this they type of activity that the left condones?

Read up on it:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_convention_protests

And whats up with the one "activist" who said he was disappointed by number of police on scene. What would happen if they were not? Would the city burn to the ground because the peace lovers would have had free reign?

Answer 1

How do you know they're left? Couldn't they be disgruntled independents? I mean we had protesters at the DNC yet we didn't assume they were right.

"Police said the size of the crowd shifted during the day before estimating it in the range of 8,000 to 10,000, many of whom marched peacefully."

LOL

Answer 2

Your first mistake is believing that Leftist are peaceful... one only has to study history to see the lie in that fantasy.. just look at Italian Fascism, German Nazism, Russian Communism, or even the French Revolution, or the Prussian system under Bismark... Shoot, one doesn't even have to go outside this country, just look into Woodrow Wilson and his administration and see what they did.... the Progressive Movement almost destroyed this country.

Answer 3

Vets against the Iraq War are protesting in force.

And, only a small number are dressing and behaving as you described (or did you read the article) .  For example, only 5 people were arrested.

Answer 4

lol, I love how you leave out this part from the article:

"Police said the size of the crowd shifted during the day before estimating it in the range of 8,000 to 10,000, many of whom marched PEACEFULLY."

and

"FIVE arrested"

Answer 5

The left is all for the peace of tyranny and the love of subjugation. More laws more tax slavery. That activist was a anarchist. Liberals want tyranny with the option to commit all the immoral acts they wish. The leader of their party wishes to cause envy of the rich in order to raise taxes and slow the economy.  The leader of the party wishes to increase spending to cause dependency on the government. Those who are in support of this evil trend "know not what they do"

They have the best of intentions. They want to help the poor and have "personal freedom" (without responsibility) We both know where the road paved with good intentions leads to. Don't we? By the way Obama, is not the leader, he just follows the true leader.