Princess Diana?

Question

So, i'm just curious as to what are everyone's opinion on the inquest results? Was her death really just the cause of some drunk driver, or a mass conspiracy? hehe =] i'm actually writing a paper on this and i'm looking for some more insight XD i'm not asking you to do my homework, i'm just asking for some public opinions lol

Answer 1

It was the correct outcome. I'm sorry to see that there are many who fell under the spell of Mohamed al Fayed and his outrageous lies and fabrications.Diana, when she was first going through divorce proceedings said some pretty outlandish things herself,but later changed her tune and was on good terms with Charles.al Fayed has never been able to crack the British establishment;he wants so much to be part of it because of some shady business dealings has been kept out.He's been a very bitter man ever since.

Now,the big problem about the paparazzi still remains;if these fools are allowed to chase down celebrities like they have been,there will be more deaths.

Answer 2

conspiracy,is my thought on it. Why is it that her driver was pronounced dead near one am and she died at 4 am ?The last movie  shown on television last August 2007, had witnesses that witnessed her arriving at a little after 3:40 in the morning , when the tunnel was only 35 minutes from the hospital. Really something to ponder.! !

Answer 3

There was talk about a little white car that was there, and then it wasn't.  What happened to it?  

Why did it take so long to get Diana to the hospital?

Seems like a coverup maybe?

Answer 4

Very complicated. Plenty of hypotheses. A mass conspiracy, most likely.

Answer 5

Where are the CCTV tapes that may have been in the tunnel??

Had you been committing a traffic violation you'd have the picture and the fine to consider.

And yet Diana meets her untimely death..... and guess what?...cos that's the only picture you'll get.

Her conduct, together with her unrivalled popularity around the world was enough to...die for......and that's what she did.

The absence of a seat belt..if true..was less significant to her well being than the royal sash across her chest.

Answer 6

That's a really complicated question. The biggest blow to the conspiracy theories, in my mind, has been the claim of Dodi Fayed's father that Tony Blair was involved with the conspiracy and cover-up. Now the royal family I can see being shady like that, but Tony Blair always struck me as a very sensible and fairly liberal man, so I seriously don't see him being involved with or even approving of such a conspiracy. If Fayed's father, the person who was closest to the victims, insists that Tony Blair was involved, in my mind that kind of kills the credibility of his whole conspiracy theory. I might have believed it otherwise.

Answer 7

Her death was caused by not wearing her seatbelt.

She was even in the backseat as well.

I started wearing mine after this happened.

Answer 8

Drunk Driver

Excessive Speed

No Seat Belts!

Let it go....

Answer 9

Sometimes I think its was simply an accident, an unfortunate accident. She seemed to have been in the wrong place at the wrong time.  At other times I would like to believe that it was in fact a created scenario that led to her death. The response time of the ambulance was slow and inexplicable for someone of her connections and status.

Much of the time I'm simply angered at the idea that she may have simply been a brood mare for the royal family, used and then pushed aside, her job done.