The future of our planet?

Question

There is a growing debate over global warming in the US. Many would claim that the IPCC has the definitive answer and there is no debate. Others provide sources not affiliated with the UN group that claim there is debate over whether A) global warming even exists, B) global warming exists but is not man-made, and C) global warming exists and has contributions from man's emissions, but that the proposals such as the Kyoto treaty and a carbon tax would not solve these problems.

Considering that Newsweek has claimed all who disagree with the IPCC are on the take from petroleum companies, is there a way to resolve the scientific veracity of either side's claims and constructively offer real solutions to the effects of industrialization on the habitability of planet Earth?

Answer 1

We are doom.  Go make your funeral arraignments.

Answer 2

Yes - Use objective science as the golden standard.

A consensus is nothing more than a group opinion.  Far from what is scientific fact.

We don't yet know if it will be warmer next year or not.  Any prediction is just a guess.  We should n't base political decisions on guesses.

Answer 3

Research all sides of the issue and don't be swayed by the media.

Always remember that "all is well" news does not sell.  Doom and gloom does!

Answer 4

Yes I accept with U the third thing is what I like to accept global warming exists and has contributions from man's emissions, but that the proposals such as the Kyoto treaty and a carbon tax would not solve these problems.

Because the Global warming is the one which starts from the starting of the melting of ICE in the iceage so there is no work from man there any how we have helped to increase the life span of warm age we have played against the nature so we are facing its wrath.