This is about cricket rules?

Question

1)A batsman hits a ball and completes two runs and is run out on the third run ? Are two runs added to his score ? If yes - Does the logic look right - Runs + wicket of one ball. Is the result same if the other batsman is run not

2) A batsman hits a ball high and scores two runs before he is caught by a fielder ? Are two runs added to his score ? If yes which team wins if the batsman required 2 runs to win the match before the BALL is bowled. Again if the runs are allowed -How will an umpire in this case determine how much runs are scored if the fielding side claims the run was incomplete before the catch was held - look at it this way one umpire has to see the bowler and the batsmen at both ends simultaneously to allow/disallow the run - difficult without the mordern technolgy used in the game

I am told in both cases runs are allowed which I find a bit difficult to accept. To Judge the answers I will need the references used for answering

Subhash

Answer 1

1) Yes, all COMPLETED runs are added to the total.

2) No, runs are not scored, but if the batsman cross once or three times (Highly unlikely) then the new batsman goes to the non-strikers end, unless its end of the over.

Answer 2

in simple words reply is   YES n NO respectively

Answer 3

1. in either case the batsman who hit the ball will get 2 runs as he is out while trying the 3rd run. The logic is right because he has completed 2 runs sucessfully & is out while he was running the 3rd run.

2. The batsman will not get a single run as the ball is hit in the air the action is performed earlier & then the batsman is started to run so the first action is hitting the ball in air so when the catch is complete not a single run will be allowed.

All the matches played under ICC code of conduct can be used as reference

Answer 4

Simple..

1) The batsman will get his two runs..The logic is right..The same result..No change..

2) He will not get a single run..

Every match played till now is a reference...

Answer 5

1) Of course, the batsman gets his runs because he has completed 2 runs.. Runs+wicket logic is ABSOLUTELY right in this case since the wicket has fallen through a RUN-OUT and the is not the bowler's wicket. THE RULE  says that the bowler and the batsman can get credit(runs and wicket respectively) on the SAME BALL.

And the result is same, whoever of the 2 batsman gets run-out.

2) I think last line does answer this query too... that the bowler has got the wicket, so batsman DOESN'T get any runs(even if runs 10! :)). So, this also negates the case u described in the rest of ur second question... no runs, no confusion....

If u want more information about cricket rules, Just WATCH CRICKET!!. Or else, u can see the following link to get some info about some basic and some complex rules(such as Duckworth-Lewis method)....

www.liveindia.com/cricket/rules.html

Or else, mail me. I m quite a buff, u see....!

Answer 6

If the batsman is run-out, the runs completed by him before run-out will be given, asper Law 38 (4). Please check the following link for details:

http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/law...  

When the batsman is caught out, the run completed by him will not be allowed asper Law 32(5).  Please check the following link for details:

http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/law...

.