What do detectives think?

Question

Of 9-11 conspiracy theories? There are plenty of websites and documentaries online presenting physical and circumstancial evidence of a cover-up. I was just curious to see what police investigators as well as PI's think of the truthers' body of evidence.

Answer 1

The only problems I see with some truthers stating that the planes were CGI's.  And, that camera angles could not get forgetting the video towers where they video tapped or on  top of their van at Battery Park.  

They do not look at who was all involved.  And, it goes all the way back to Ruby Ridge.  They do not look at key players nor did thorough background checks.  They see and hear what the media gives them.

But, do a through background check on everyone people will soon realize Mossad/Israel attacked us.  And, they blamed it on a Palestinian/Arab Attack.

Answer 2

They are all bogus and for the most-part, come from uncredible sources.

Every major history-altering event in history has been surrounded by conspiracy theories. From Lincoln's assassination to Pearl Harbor, to Kennedy's slaying, to 9/11. Psychologically this is explained in that people are inapt to accept simple explanations for such seemingly intricate, well-planned events.

Kennedy Assassination: From the start there were so many conflicting stories, perspectives, and rumors flying around, so the case was screwed to begin with. HOWEVER all evidence suggests that only one shooter was invoved: Oswald. Now, people find it hard to grasp that one looser ex-marine with bad social skills and bland life-history could change the course of history.

Same as 9/11. People find it hard to believe that 19 uneducated, Islamic losers could plan and carry out the most devastating attack in US history. Of course the key people fuelling these theories are those who dispise the government anyway. The fact is, every one of the over 100 credible investigations by both government and private organizations has found evidence consistant with the official findings: no conspiracy took place.

People may pick and chose facts of the case and explain them in different ways to validate conspiracy theories, however all of these indeed have other explanations which hold water as well. Collectively, all of the facts can only lead to one explanation.

Example: I have heard people say, "Well the steel used in the WTC melts at 3,000 degress F, but the jet fuel only burnt at 1800. True, BUT the engineers in the investigations agreed that 1800 degrees, along with the impact which broke, bent, and twisted much of teh key supports in three floors; was more than significant enough to weaken the steel to the point where it could not support the MILLIONS of tons of steel and concrete on the levels above, thus causing the collapse.

"What about the poofs of 'smoke' coming from the bottom floor windows as the buildings collapsed? Isn't that consistent with charges exploding in planned demolition projects, indicating someone else caused the collapse?" - Not neccesarilly. The building was a huge enclusure, like a tunnel. With hundreds of millions of tons of steel and concrete collapsing down on the enclosed structure, the enormouse increase in pressure on the lower levels would have cause poofs of debris to come out of windows, vents, and any other weak parts of the structure.