Wwe Raw? a Bit Selfish?

Question

they already have

Orton

Batista

Cena

CM Punk

HBK

Jericho

Mysterio

JBL

Kane

and now they want The Undertaker? there were rumors that Undertaker will move to RAW,due to backstage problems with HHH. wow! i mean RAW already got those main eventers and they're still not contented with that?! they have too much main eventers that some of them were underrated..another reason is The Divas. they already got the best Divas on their roster and SD only got few divas and Few TALENTED divas,they should give someone to Smackdown! maybe Cena should move to Smackdown or Randy Orton perhaps. and they should give Mickie James or Melina to Smackdown. honestly i'm a Smackdown Fan.

what are your opinions?

Bonus Question: who's Hotter Beth Phoenix or Natalya?

Answer 1

I know, if you notice in the draft, besides michael cole, they took all main eventers from the draft

Answer 2

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WHAT RAW WANTS. DID YOU STOP AND THINK THAT IT COULD BE WHAT THE UNDERTAKER WANTS?

BTW, KANE IS NOT EXACTLY A MAIN EVENTER, HE'S MORE OF AN UPPER MIDCARDER, BUT HE SHOULD BE A MAIN EVENTER. PLUS IF UNDERTAKER COMES OVER, WE WOULD GET TO SEE UT VS. KANE MORE OFTEN WHICH WOULD MAKE RAW BETTER IN MY OPINION. RAW NEEDS ALL THE HELP IT CAN GET ANYWAY BECAUSE SD'S BEEN TWICE AS GOOD AS RAW SINCE THE DRAFT.

PLUS, SD STILL HAS HHH AND EDGE

RAW WAS NOT THE FIRST SHOW TO PUT WWF/E ON THE MAP:

COUGH ORIGINAL SNME COUGH

Answer 3

The thing is if you think about it no matter how many main eventers Raw has it will get really boring, With or without Taker.

Every main eventer on Raw has already accomplished the top prize so they got no where to really go apart from getting the title back again.

Smackdown has ALL the future talent, And all the future main eventers, Future world champs etc etc

Smackdown is better than Raw and will be for a while because they got talent that you can see grow and develop and win their first world titles and things but on Raw it's like 'What else is new' ?

Going to what you said about Raw wanting Taker,

Maybe management decided that it was better and it was a good change to make, I do agree that Taker seems to be the headline of smackdown to many people but maybe things aren't working out on that brand for him so he wants to change or maybe they want him to work a feud with a current Raw superstar that doesen't want to go to smackdown so Taker has to move to Raw. There's lots of reasons why Taker could move to Raw it's not because Raw wants him.

As far as Divas go, On Raw there are very few divas that can wrestle, You got Mickie James, Beth Pheonix, Melina and I know people will highly dis-agree with me on this but Kelly Kelly has improved A LOT, I'm not saying she is championship material or anything quite yet BUT from prancing around the ring on ECW to doing actual wrestluing moves on Raw is good so got to give her credit for that.

Smackdown has the talent as far as divas and wrestlers go, They got Natayla, Michelle McCool and Victoria who is probobly one of the best in the WWE currently yet they got her jobbing. I don't think any of the divas from Raw should go to smackdown because I think the smackdown divas division is increasing as far as talent is concerned.

Answer 4

Well, they needed to switch things up. the same ppl on the same shows was gonna get really old really fast.

Bonus: they're both pretty, but i think Natalya's prettier.

Answer 5

mcmahon targets raw rather than sd to be the no. 1 brand.Thats why when people get drafte to raw their chances of getting push is small since there are many top superstars so its hard for them to be on tv.When london and kendrick were drafted to raw they were jobbers,cartito was drafted to raw got a push but later was a jobber that why many people before the draft wants to go to ecw or sd

Bq:Beth phoenix

Answer 6

No matter what happens, Vince McMahon will always be biased towards RAW because it is his first and oldest show and the show that put his product on the map. SmackDown, as far as he and the rest of the wrestling world is concerned, will always be the B show.

Anyway SmackDown has a wealth of young, talented wrestlers and I think that should be its selling point. Most of the guys on SmackDown! can be main-eventers in their own right and since all the main-eventers are on RAW, well, that can give most of SmackDown! the opportunity to shine in their own light and grow as wrestlers and sports-entertainers.

EDIT: BQ: Beth Phoenix.

Answer 7

Maybe they should , but I am going to see RAW in November at the M.E.N in Manchester - so its good to know that at least it will be fun  

Answer 8

The time Vince cared about SD! is when SD! was at its first 5 years when he always was there and now he barely appears at the blue brand.

The big happenings happens to SD! like the Hogan-McMahon feud and the Lesnar-Angle feud but now look the blue brand is now getting better but WWE decides to bring it down more.

Taker on RAW would do wonders for RAW but weakens SD!

What would be the biggest thing on SD!??

The Kings Of Backstage Politics Hunter???

Taker worked his a** of Hunter just sleeps with his boss' daughter.

Answer 9

Well, Raw is supposed to be the WWE's flagship show, which is why it seems like they have the most superstars, but to me, Smackdown is becoming the more fun to watch show with JR and Tazz calling the action and building up newer superstars like Vladimir Kozlov.

Beth Phoenix is hotter.