Zakir Naik vs Charles Dawkins?

Question

Don't you think if this debate was to ever happen it would show if Islam or Atheism is right? I mean it would be nice to see who comes out on top.

Don't you agree?

Answer 1

017.081

YUSUFALI: And say: "Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish."

PICKTHAL: And say: Truth hath come and falsehood hath vanished away. Lo! falsehood is ever bound to vanish.

The falsehood will never be able to compete with the truth.

Answer 2

its RICHARD dawkins

or charles DARWIN

And the argument is already over

Answer 3

Naik is the man who still believes the earth is flat because the quran says so

lol

Answer 4

zakir will win  

he works hard  and ALLAH helps him

Answer 5

I don't think it would be a fair debate in the first place.  Zakir Naik knows religion well, whereas Dawkins is a scientist.  These people aren't even in the same field.  

To me, Naik's scientific arguments are sometimes vague or unscholarly, and Dawkins' are really confusing and limited.

I also think a debate isn't the best way to achieve these goals.

Answer 6

Yes i agree you we will watch it,promise?

plzzzzzzzz,that will tell me should muslim be athiest?

Answer 7

Atheism would, hands down.

Answer 8

Yes it would be nyc to see who wins people have various opinions and beliefs, but i firmly believe that Dr Zakir Naik will win because the Qur'an itself is the Haq as sister sarah said and truth always prevails falsehood.

Assalamu alaikum wb

Answer 9

I think Naik would not be capable of an honest debate because he would always fall back on misinterpreting scripture and telling lies about it.  Dawkins would be constrained by intellectual honesty.