Republicans, knowing what you know now, would you have voted for Bush in 2000?

Question

Republicans, knowing what you know now, would you have voted for Bush in 2000?

Answer 1

Yes, he told what he was going to go to war and he did it. This country wanted him to do it and now all you Liberals are complaining. Get over it. We wanted this war and he gave it to us. Its to late to back out now. What would you rather the war to be here on our soil?!!?!?!?!

Answer 2

Most Republicans will say yes, and would be telling the truth.  Because their other option was Al Gore.

It would be the Independents who might rethink their vote.

Answer 3

Given that Gore was the other choice it was the reason many people decided to vote for Bush, even when they no longer liked him. The lesser of two evils. I find Gore is exactly what I expected, a far left foaming at the mouth liberal.

Answer 4

I didn't vote for him in 2000 , nor in 2004.

Answer 5

I did not vote for Bush in his first primary.  I voted for Pete Wilson, then Governor of California.  But, being stuck with Bush, I voted for him because I d**n sure would never have voted for Gore under any circumstances whatsoever.

Now, history is repeating itself.  I'm voting for McCain mainly because his shortcomings pale in comparison to those of his dippy opponent.

Answer 6

This is the same as asking "If you had to be g*y would you rather blow a guy or take it up the @ss?"  Think I would probably be an ex-pat right now.  d**n I hate the Federal Governement and the whole system.

Answer 7

Yes.