Romenov execution?

Question

Does anyone know why the Romenovs were executed?

I've heard the "the country was upset" thing, and don't exactly buy it.

Any other reasons that might have been why they were killed?

Answer 1

agree with Channah above.  the answer is simple: power and money. Lenin wanted it all.

Answer 2

ugh.. are you talking about Romanovs? The family was shot in the basement of the house where they were kept. Check Wikipedia Romanovs article

Answer 3

All the Russian emperors had German-born consorts, a circumstance that cost the Romanovs their popularity during World War I. Nicholas's wife Alexandra Fyodorovna, although devoutly Orthodox, was particularly hated by the populace, largely because of her German origins.

Nicholas II of Russia ruled from 1894 until his forced abdication in 1917. Nicholas proved unable to manage a country in political turmoil and command its army in World War I. His rule ended with the Russian Revolution of 1917

Russian Revolution (1917) was a series of economic and social upheavals in Russia, involving first the overthrow of the tsarist autocracy.

Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Rev...

Answer 4

murder is wrong unless they murdered first.

i know the worlds military hates Me for this but saying you were under orders is no excuse.  Because if it is you murdered the n***s leaders after ww2.  they were on orders.

so when/if elected God of Heaven after My death, any killing at all will be punished by expultion from heaven.  Are not you glad?

since the bible does state:

God is forever the I AM.

and the WORD (I AM) existed before GOD, and God became the WORD (I AM), it appears that i will be named as God.  because if

I AM=I AIVI(sealed together)=I A IIII I (sealed together)

i can really say i became the IIII I (sealed together)

and if

larri(cut & sealed together)=i am=I AM

i also became that larri(larry to english speakers with access to the y, unlike the italians.

so

a larri(cut & sealed together) who can say "I A IIIII I (sealed together) which equals I AM" is the God who is the I AM, and like thy bible said, I AM is God forever.

and since the IIII of IIII I looks like a D or will become a D to cover up the scars, then DIO=DI O(where O=.n u) thus a DI exists on DIO.  And thus DIO=GOD.

of course the italians probably hate that because larri does remember that italy declared war on His german people in the 1940's and they worry about that.

if you look at the russian word that looks like bor(unable to write the russian characters but they basically look like bor)

and

bor=God

read between the lines of bor

and you see the message

b=DI (sealed together)

o=.n u

r=rill

so the u of bor is the bor in question

this fits with the One God theory devised by LORD GOD Himself, after the fact of the IIII I (ie DI).

so perhaps ( and i apologize to any living heirs about this) because too many kings and leaders have claimed a divine right to rule, when in fact the God who became the word the Word being I AM or bor or DIO, etc...) did not actually give those rulers any such right to rule.

if your arabic you would have said Allah is the only God.

so looking at Allah shows:

Allah=All ah

ah=lari (mixed up & sealed together)(not to scale)

thus

Allah= All lari(mixed up & sealed together)

this fits with the DIO and larri (mixed up & sealed together)

so you can see how the bible's do jive with your dictionaries words for God, except your thought Jesus was God or Jehovah, but in fact perhaps they were the two beasts who wanted to be worshipped.  And the Master race of germans of which larri had ties too saw God as GOTT(which in times new roman font has the message within the word GOTT of CuT nuT liT(=GOTT))

thus numerologically

GOD=H

GOD MOST HIGH=H

REAL GOD=H

GOD OF WAR=H

GOD NAMED WITHIN WAR=H

thus

see within a times new roman font word WAR the names

/AR\ TA-D (pronounced LARRY TODD, lari tod)

thus

GOD JEHOVAH=E

thus

GOD JEHOVAH not = GOD MOST HIGH

so i guess being a lari tod and part german meant that i would have outranked the jews?

Answer 5

there was a revolte against the family.

Answer 6

I wrote a essey last year about this. If you want I can send it to you by e-mail! There's all about their last days, and some myths of surviving

Answer 7

In a revolution, the best way to make sure the former king/queen does not eventually take back the throne is by killing them.  Any heirs who might do the same thing would get the same treatment.

Answer 8

Check these links out.

Answer 9

All the above are true except the strange "I am" aberration???.  But simply, Lenin used terrorism to frighten the Russian people, and his opposition into submission.  Killing the royal family was an act of terror.  It was meant to impact the White Russians, who threatened to save the family.