Question:

Rushing A Behind?

by Guest57957  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

What do you think of rushing a behind i mean its probably not the smartest thing to do considering you may lose by 1 point i mean may aswell try and get it out of the 50 rather than give them a point and then they get it back nayway and they end up getting 7 points out of it.

 Tags:

   Report

7 ANSWERS


  1. The only team that shouldn't rush behind is Sydney.  They lose by less than 5 in the important matches and those behinds come back to bite them


  2. it should not be aloud because that's cowardly and dumb

  3. A rushed behind should be 3 points, that will stop the cowards.

  4. sometimes they have to do it

  5. they wood rather concade a point to get a decent kick then you risk it by forcing a kick and giving away a goal.

  6. either as Arsenal says, make it three points, or hand the ball to the opponent of whoever pushed or kicked it through, who then gets a free kick.

    if it your team's full back that "concedes" a point, he then has to watch his opponent have a go from the goalsquare!

    if it is your team's FF that fumbles it, of course the fullback has his kick.

    put it to a TV umpire if the AFL thinks the goalies and field umps can't work it out.

  7. its annoying, yes maybe in the last quarter i suppose you could call it acceptable but otherwise its extremely irritating :@
You're reading: Rushing A Behind?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 7 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.