Question:

Russia more likely to Nuclear bomb, Poland, Georgia, UK, USA?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

And why?????????????????

 Tags:

   Report

7 ANSWERS


  1. all they said was Poland would be treated as a actionable object and distroyed in the first order ,meaning when war start poland  will eat it first.  that was the first article the rest just left it out to make russian look crazy.


  2. well uk is on russia's side uk got usa dunno about poland georgia is in the middle

  3. Russia is not going to nuke any of them.  The situation would have to be desperate for the USA or Russia to use their nukes.

  4. and nuclear bombing of any of them causes world war 3 and world annihilation, so i'd call it unlikely

  5. Bob,

    Although it is unlikely, it is highly possible. Russia would be more than likely to nuke Poland. They can take Georgia with conventional forces with ease. The would not nuke the UK, because it is a major revenue source, especially for energy. They would not nuke the U.S., because of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction).

    However, Poland would be the likely country to be nuked simply for the fact that they have agreed to have a US missile defense shield constructed in their country. Would we allow a missile defense system in Cuba? I think not, and Russia feels the same about a missile defense shield in their back yard. In fact, just this week they have said they will destroy any missile installations in Poland, however they must do it (ie nukes).

    Hope this helps. Good Luck!

  6. If they bomb America all I will say is that the UK better not have to bail them out of yet ANOTHER war.

    As for why, it's because America wants to put up some type of shield in Poland (after being refused to do it in Russia) to protect them from being nuked by China (if it was in Poland, it would obviously leave Russia open to exposure) but to be fair, it's all George Bush's fault as per usual.

  7. None of them. No nuclear war will break out unless the people want life on Earth to cease. Russia isn't stupid, they know if they launch missiles, they'll get them back causing wide scale destruction. The only nation I believe may engage in nuclear warfare is rogue states such as Iraq,Syria etc IF they obtain the knowledge to construct nuclear missiles in the future. All countries have withheld from attacking other countries simply due to the fact that they know a fierce response would be on it's way. A nuclear missile in Georgia would stretch international pressure to boiling point and have huge repercussions. A Nuclear missile on Poland would do just the same - A Russian General claimed that Poland was subjecting itself to attack 100% due to the missile interceptors being built there for the Americans. Diplomatic relations between Russia would become Abysmal, economic sanctions put in against them and possibly an invasion if more threats were given. Everything has a consequence and Russia or any other country would not be wise to cause too much trouble.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 7 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.