SAS vs Navy SEALs, who would win?

Question

Who do you think? SAS were the original, so I think them!

Answer 1

Navy seals hands down. They have more numbers more funding more technology more boats ( biggest navy in the world) and more training...

Answer 2

Australian Officers Have to go through 18 months training and an ordinary soldier in the Australian Army 12 months and SAS, they just go through mch training, I don't know about Britains SAS but less than 1% of Australian SAS candidates pass induction and Training, I learned this from a mate of mine in the SAS who now suroervises Training.

Answer 3

The SAS would completely dominate the seals. SAS go through heavy training and if you read any books on them whcih i do then you will find that one SAS soldier could take out 40-70 seals by themselves. sure seals have numbers but they dont have the tactics, training or minds of sas troopers

Answer 4

Although both the SAS and SEALs are amazing soldiers im going to go with the SAS. The SAS are what every special ops ferce in the world strive to be like. Plus, if you research delta force origins. You will find that when a US colonel went over to England and was briefed on the latest SAS tactics he realized that there were no US special forces that could do any job. when he got back to the states this colonel formed the delta force. So, my point is that in a combat situation the Navy SEALs would be restricted to a small set of tactics while the SAS could operate efficiently in any scenario.