Save a poacher, or the last mountain gorilla?

Question

Which life would be more important to you?

Answer 1

I would save the last of any animal over the poacher.

Answer 2

they should have hired expert marksman snipers in trees to kill poachers.poachers killed that lady who lived with the gorillas. remember?.they hacked her to death with machetes.

and why don't they build a tall fence around those gorillas mountain.so that they cant get out and put guards with automatic weapons  there to protect them.a fence .a few guards. some cameras.it couldn't cost that much.someone please do something before it to late for the

orangutans also, in ten years there will be no more wild ones left.their cutting down their trees .the Chinese just a few months ago killed off the Banji White river dolphins.I support Sea Shepherd society who protects whales and other oceans life

death to anyone killing on purpose an endangered species.

Answer 3

This is a really good question!

I would want to save the gorillas life but what if you try save it and it kills you?

Answer 4

The gorrilla. Its the last of its kind. And since a poacher is so senseless, he doesn't deserve to be called a human being. But then, since its the last mountain gorilla...its his choice if he wants to live or not. All his buddies are gone, maybe he would want to go also. But still, the poacher should burn in eternal torture, always feeling the pain he caused, like like how Ghost Rider does in his enemies. Poachers deserve no mercy, after they killed an innocent being.

Answer 5

In all seriousness, the gorilla.  Sorry, it would be more important to the planet on a environmental and biological level.

Answer 6

I wouldn't save a poacher no matter the circumstances.

Answer 7

There are more than enough poachers in the world. Save the last mountain gorilla. It was poachers that put them in that place to begin with.

Answer 8

Oh, the gorilla, ofcourse.. Is that bad?

Answer 9

We had this problem where I stayed in Central America. We worked to save the Leatherback Sea Turtle (an endangered species). Many poachers would come down to steal Leatherback turtle eggs. These people were just trying to make a living through a means they found lucrative. Although I would hardly be faced with the scenario above, I grieve for both species. It seems to be an unnaturally accelerated evolutionary spiral. If I tried to save the gorilla, the poacher would most likely kill me, then kill the gorilla. You see, the poacher lives in a tough world where it's so difficult to feed himself and his family. He needs the gorilla to survive in his world. The gorilla's survival demands human failure, which would go against evoluntionary trends. Let's address the root problem of a society that drives a man to such desperate measures, and ends tragically for both creatures.

Answer 10

I would have to say the gorilla... Don't get me wrong... human life is important... but the LAST gorilla? of course i would save it.  of course you save the victim.

Answer 11

I would definitely save the gorilla. Why kill off an entire species just for someone who wants to get rid of them.

Answer 12

The Gorilla, hands down!

Answer 13

gorilla.    man is the only species on the planet that finds reasons for destruction of our natural resources.  if there is just one gorilla left then it is most likely mans fault.