Senderos going to Milan?

Question

Good or Bad?

Why?

Answer 1

At least he'll get a sun tan sitting in the Milan reserves!

Can't understand that move at all!

Maybe Flamini recommended him, trying to re-pay his debt to the club by getting milan to sign  Arsenal's sh*ter players to get them some money back!

Answer 2

Well it is only a loan but it is good because of his mistake against Liverpool in the CL quarter final and we don't use him much either.

Answer 3

Yippppeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! (enough said!)

Answer 4

Good for Arsenal? I didn't think he was anything amazing to be honest

Answer 5

Good, he'll end up signing for Milan after the loan period as well. I think he will he well suited to Italian football as it is slower than the Premier League. I think he will probably improve alot over the years but he isn't good enough at the moment-his worst moment being his defensive errors against Liverpool in the second match of the Quarter Finals. I don't think we will see him play at Arsenal again, which is not the end of the world. But I don't doubt that he will become a great defender in years to come.

Answer 6

GOOD!

although it is only on loan, wenger might start to buy some better and more experienced players!

some people might say its bad because we have less players but we didnt really use senderos anyway. plus we have gallas, toure, djourou as CB's which is plenty and this gives us a chance to buy some more players

=]

Answer 7

Never mind we have Silvest

Answer 8

I can't believe Milan are signing him - he's an awful player!