Shane warne or murali whos the best?

Question

Shane warne or murali whos the best?

Answer 1

shane warne because he has taken of best teams while murali has taken most of his wickets by weak teams

Answer 2

Murali, the other one is a known drug cheat.

Answer 3

i think muralis best.

Answer 4

Shane warne

Answer 5

Both are best and lethal when the conditions are favouring them. Both had tremendous records playing at home but warne's record in international outings is good compared to murali.

Answer 6

Murali is the best. For those who do not like him or the Asians, Warne is the best, though he was, has been and is in the habit of using drugs and was already once punished for that offence.

Answer 7

murali because he owns and doesn't take drugs. Even thought Warne has taken more wickets than murali, he has played more matches. Murali has a better bowling average

Answer 8

Muarli

he's gone trough a great deal of chaos in his carrer.

Answer 9

I think murali is better than shane in sub-continent pitches,But shane is better in other parts of the globe. As sub-continent pitches are usually spinner friendly,So in my opinion shane is the best.

Answer 10

Interesting ,..i may say so,..Murali must be the best, the Australian  bowler you mentioned here,..is a best known for  addiction to .....human distruction,..abominable drugs,..well thats the truth~....whoever says publicly,..Worne is a sportsman,.. has got  ..a personal  "TENDANCY" to consume drugs too ..Amen...for their  sinful bondage towards drugs~Yet ,Both masters of spin  couldn't  avoid of scandals & controversies and both of  them  had contrasting areas to be concerned about their authenticity~

With Shane , he will always have that cloud over his head because he made the mistake of taking banned dgugs as sportsmen.Where as muthiah also always have his action under scrutiny constantly~

Answer 11

Both are best in their style.

Shane has still power in him

Muralidharans' Doosra helps him a lot

Answer 12

Shane warne for me, was better to watch bowl, he is my favourite bowler of all time, when it comes to watching him bowl. However in one dayers i will say murali has done much better, and stats will also the same in test, but in test for me, warne is better.

Answer 13

Both are great spinners.They are the best stars in the sky of cricket.

Answer 14

Murali Murali Murali by far...

Answer 15

Shane warne is all time best.

Answer 16

Tough question to answer. Its just like choosing between Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara who's the best batsman?

I personally think that shane was the best amongst the two simply because Legspin is a very tough art to master and when shane started legspin bowling was nearly dead. Shane Warne did bowl some memorable deliveries. Like bowling Gatting. Like when he bowled both Jaques kallis and a pakistani batsman between their legs. He failed only in india and that too against the great Tendulkar. On the other hand Murali has a slight advantage with his hand and he bowls most of the time in sub-continent pitches which hepls in spin bowling.

Answer 17

A difficult one!

Shane may have shone in IPL, but Murali has a better record.

Answer 18

warne has 708 wickets however mulari has already beaten his record.. so you would have to say mulari

Answer 19

definitely.....Shane Warne...he is mind blowing...

Answer 20

i think shane warne is the best as because as he suits best for his captainship.

Answer 21

there is no doubt that Shane Warne is the best.

it can be proved by his recent performance in IPL.

Answer 22

Its Murali all the way !

Answer 23

Shane Warne no doubt

Answer 24

I think it's warne b'coz he is the worlds best bowler. murali is playing to break the records. If warne will play for some more years then he will list his wickets which no one can break.

Answer 25

This will be forever debated.

However, I feel the mantle would go to Shane Warne for a few main reasons.

1. Warney has taken his wickets all over the world and on non-turning pitches. Murali however has taken a majority of his wickets on the sub continents turning tracks.

2. Warney has also won more games by his hand than any other player. Now sure it is a team game, but Murali has not 'turned' as many games into Sri Lanka's favor like Warney has done for the Aussies.

3. Extra value added by Warney's superior batting and fielding. I know they will be judged by their bowling records however, for overall team value, you must also consider the other aspects such as batting and fielding.

Now, they have both not escaped their controversies and each of them has had different problems in that regard.

With Warney, he will always have that cloud over his head because he made the mistake of taking a diarrheic. But Murali will also always have his action under scrutiny where it has even been argued about how valid his wickets are anyway.

Answer 26

Shane Warne

Murali had to have the rules of cricket changed (the angle that is considered chucking... i think from 13 degrees to 15) just to accomodate his action.

SO that means BEFORE this rule change, he was chucking the cricket ball...

Imagine if Warne had have played that season he missed (through his 1 year ban)... he would have had 15-75 more wickets than he finished with

Answer 27

warne

Answer 28

I don't understand why people here bringing here point of drugs & human destruction etc. here I think question is for there bowling skill & not asking for who does what in their personal lives.

    I think by forgetting all other things & only concentrating on bowling skills Shane Warne is surely best among both. Simply bcaz of the fact that Leg Spin is quite difficult to bowl. Murali got objected from ICC for bowling action. Shane got more wickets in other sub continents than asia which is home continent for murali.