She was anastasia?

Question

I no with all my heart that anna was who she said she was I have a book on her and she looks just like her.

same everything birthmarks hand writing the whole 9.

DNA want use 2 think she didn't live.

I no better I can read between the lines.

she never really claimed 2 be her in the first place.

everybody else was saying she was.

she did was nobody 2 no who she was.

they could go 2 h**l 4 all she cared 4 what they did 2 her and the family

Answer 1

And your question is?

Answer 2

Following Anna Anderson's death, the DNA tests were conducted on samples of her tissue that had been stored at a Charlottesville, Virginia hospital following a medical procedure. The DNA tests showed that Anderson's DNA did not match the Romanov remains or Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (a relative of the Romanovs), but was consistent with the mitochondrial DNA profile of Karl Maucher, a great-nephew of Franziska Schanzkowska. Therefore, Anna was a fraud.

Note: In January 2008 Russian scientists announced that the charred remains of a young boy and a young woman found near Ekaterinburg in August 2007 are most likely those of the thirteen-year-old Tsarevich and one of the four Romanov grand duchesses, possibly the long lost missing Princess Anastasia. Final results of the DNA testing are scheduled to be announced later in April or May 2008.

Answer 3

DNA tests have confirmed that none of the women claiming to be Anastasia are related to the Russian royal family.

Answer 4

I'm sorry what are you asking, a question or a simultaneous equation??

Answer 5

A female relative of the Romanov's died in Toronto a few years back. She was invited to tea on the Royal Yacht Brittania, whe the Queen was visiting Toronto several years ago. See The Toronto Star.

Answer 6

dna tests proved that she was not Anastasia.