Should 911-nuts be seperated from rational people and given South Dakota or Rhode Island?

Question

Believe it or not, at one point, thirty percent of the country believed in 911-nuttery. Imagine if we could humanly relocate these nuts into an entirely separate nut-country. Think of how awesome that would be. Future generations of Americans would be substantially brighter because smarter people would be passing on their smarter genes.

I know, all this seems all to darwinian but I'm not talking about camps for 911 nuts. Just relocation. Feed them. Provide shelter for them. Even trade with them, after all, I see no reason why they eventually couldn't learn to produce various textiles or other simple but necessary products.

Answer 1

Definitely not RI, me being from CT, I sometimes go there and use their beaches.  Its actually quite a charming state.  RI also has many of its people coming over to our casinos in CT, thus contributing to are state treasury. Wouldn't really want to ruin it. That said, I would prefer to move them out of the country(Northern Siberia?)

Answer 2

I have no clue what your yapping about

Answer 3

Rhode Island, then we could chop it off and set it adrift.

Answer 4

Yes.

Almonds should go to Nevada, Cashews to Florida, and Pecans to Nebraska

Wokka Wokka Wokka

Answer 5

They should be shipped to Afghanistan to see how horrible terrorists can be, oh but wait, they did ON 9-11-01 in New York, the Pentagon & the Penn. field.

Answer 6

What's even nuttier is that there will be people willing to trust the GOP again after the last 8 years of fiasco.

Answer 7

Yeah, that's a great idea. Move people with different opinions away from generalized society.

FACT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvE...

Answer 8

hard to say....Part of South Dakota was declared independent of the US in January.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of... and Rhode Island is part of New England, which would be included in the New England Confederation http://www.newenglandconfederationallian...

maybe we should give them Hawii or Alaska... oh, no wait http://www.hawaii-nation.org/  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaskan_Ind...

maybe we should just be glad someone wants to live in the US and just sedate them or something...

Edit:

Oh and Obama getting elected is going to be equivalent to Lincoln if it happens. Except instead of fearing freedom of slaves, it's going to be fearing socialism (half of the country already had freed the slaves, half of the country is already socialist). Except unless all of those groups collaborate (which isn't entirely unlikely) then this Civil War will be freaking ridiculously large. (commence with the thumbs downs....)

Answer 9

Not South Daktoa.  That is way to close to Iowa.

:)

Answer 10

No. Give them Bikini Atoll.

Answer 11

Do you really believe 30% of this country could fit into Rhode Island.

Who is nuts?

Besides, 9/11 "nuttery" is around for a reason.  Its quite obvious that the government is covering up something.

Now personally, I believe its their own incompetence.  But its fairly easy to see why so many would go to the idea that the government had a hand in it.  

Aside from the fact that the terrorists got through, our response to the situation was d*mn near worthless.  It took Bush at least 5 minutes of reading "The Pet Goat" before he realized that there was a problem that required IMMEDIATE attention.  Either he was too incompetent to realize it, or he was intentionally ignoring it.

I personally believe incompetence.  But again, you can see the jump to intentional ignoring it.

One must ask how you can see all the cover-ups and not wonder why?  Are you that nuts (and 30% fitting in Rhode Island suggests you are), or are you intentionally ignoring the culpability of the President and his Adminstration in this matter?

Answer 12

Why ruin two great states lets give them Antarctica then I don't have to deal with them l live in Connecticut