I am constantly faced with the realization that my life is good, but according to the news, everyone else's life is miserable. This leads to two possible democracy theories:
A. Vote for what is best for me. If everyone does this, and life is miserable for most people, than the miserable people will get what they want. If life is good for most people, then the good life will continue.
B. Vote for what is best for my neighbor. This theory would presuppose that either my neighbor does not know what is best for himself, or that their are not enough citizens in my neighbor's horrible predicament to change things.
Which theory do you like and why?
Tags: