Question:

Should BCCI reopen the harbhajan case against symonds?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Harbhajan has shown his true color.It is the slap which will cost him huge sum and reputation.Isnt it time for BCCI to reopen the symonds case?

Symonds complained that harbhajan racial abused him by saying "monkey".Then it is sachin who supported harbhajan and said that it is Maa Ki and not monkey.

What does maa ki mean? maa ki.......(private part of symonds mother) This is a greater offense than a slap.

BCCI should immediately reopen this case. It will come under more than offense level 5.

 Tags:

   Report

17 ANSWERS


  1. Well the Case has already been closed and the results were in the favor of Harbhajan now theres nothing that BCCI can do because it was matter of ICC and it has already Passed 90 days period.


  2. They can reopen it but they willget nothing

    Their is a misunderstanding of a hindi word which sounds same to monkey

    it is not a racial abuse it is only abuse

    As in hindi it is called 'teri maan ki'

  3. No...

    there is no need to go to the past but need is to implement strictly the current punishment...

    India need to be aggressive against other teams but same time mutual friendship n warmth among fellow country players is needed the most.....

    the need of the hour......

  4. If BCCI opens the Harbhajan case against Symonds, BCCI will have no moralevalue in international level as it was because of strong protest by BCCI and the support of BCCI,Harbajan got away from that case.

  5. BCCI spent so much money and blackmailing to put Harbhajan out of that case why you think they will reopen it. They always knew that Bad Boy Bhajji did called Symmo Monkey

  6. Yeah we should not support him because he is Indian

    But I agree with Bubbles

  7. First the BCCI needs to open up its eyes!

  8. no way.

  9. no

  10. Yupp....you r right....the case must be reopened

  11. BCCI has supported harbhajan and now there is no question of reopening and the same is not allowed as per ICC rules.I think he has got proper punishment and councelling will be good to bring him back.However shreesant need to better take care as he is no saint as proved by umpire saheba who warned him several time for provoking.I think we need to be with harbhajan as he is our main bowler as Kumble is on verge of retirement and there are not many spinners on sidelines.

  12. No....plz don't start the previous controversies again! Bhajji has got what he deserved! ( He has been banned from IPL)

  13. Harbhajan has got what he deserves although he should get more but sreesanth with his crocodile tears has gotten away. It is against him that an investigation must be set up now.

  14. There's no need for that because his karma will always haunt Harbhajan. Look at Symonds, he is in great form and has also scored a century in IPL and look at where Harbhajan is.

  15. instead i would suggest that a new player be given a chance and make harbhajan a 12th man for the next 1 year carrying towels and drinks to younger players as a punishment

  16. No. This is a separate incident. BCCI  backed Harbhajan on Symond's incidennt against the  Anti-racialism  which was objected total team management including Sachin Tendulkar. Beside that  reopen the case, will raise a  question agianst the BCCI governing body about its   transperency

  17. You should never keep holding on to Past. People need to move ON and ON and ON!!!!!!

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 17 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.