Should Cipriani really have replaced WIlkinson??

Question

Should Cipriani really have replaced WIlkinson??

Answer 1

Yes.

It's good that Cipriani was given the opportunity.

Wilkinson will need to be replaced permanently one day.

Answer 2

Without a doubt, the boy has talent and brings an excitement

not seen when Wilkinson is playing.

Barring injuries and loss of form form Cipriani could be in for a long stint at first five.

Answer 3

Yes, but....

I think that JW was dropped because when he has a bad game, the whole team has a bad game.  Ashton, rightly in my opinion, had to get them playing without relying on him so much.

His career isn't over.  England will be better for this.

BTW I'm about to post a Q about Martin Johnson.  I'd like your views.