Question:

Should EPA let Nascars run unregulated blowing harmfully emissions out causing global warming

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Should EPA let Nascars run unregulated blowing harmfully emissions out causing global warming

 Tags:

   Report

31 ANSWERS


  1. Nascars..hmmmm..dingaling


  2. Should the EPA continue to let you blow unregulated harmful emissions out of your mouth?

    If the EPA tries to come down on NASCAR then they're going to have to go after every racing series, local and national, across America because they're all privately owned, just like NASCAR is. If millions of people want to drive hundreds of miles to see NASCAR races every year, then that's their American right to do so.

    Why don't you look back over your Civics and history homework so you'll understand more about what the government can and can't do to our rights?

  3. should the epa let you drive to work should the epa let you run your computer should the epa let hockey rinks use energy to freeze the ice should the epa let soccer football golf baseball etc. cut the grass  

  4. NASCAR is doing their part to fight global warming.  I heard Elliott Sadler, Kenny Schrader, and Boris Said have all decided to become pirates.

  5. yes why not  

  6. yes they should

  7. more emissions come from daily peeps like you and the rest of us driving and lots of crappy cars on the highway...as for global warming..we have already destroyed it so why worry, that's the American way( sarcasm intended)

    Interesting question..NOT!

    ROFLMAO at Wedge Ann..loved your answer...still laughing and a thumbs up to ya!

  8. Maybe they should just switch to little electric cars like the Smart Car! I know I sure would be excited to see 43 little cars taking the high banks at Talladega at exactly 65MPH!!! Of course I'm being a little sarcastic....no offense but without the harmful emissons we would have no NASCAR, with No NASCAR no use for this forum. I'm sure the EPA has already taken a good stone cold look at NASCAR and has for years, heck it's the gov't you know.

  9. I DONT THINK 43 CARS WOULD HURT OUR OZONE OR MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WITH EMMISSION I WOULD SEE MORE OF AN ISSUE WITH CONSERVING FUEL THEN THE AIR BEING THERE ARE LOTS MORE CARS IN THE CITYS THAN AT A RACE TRACK THE ONLY PROBLEM YOU MAY GET FROM A RACE IS CARBON MANOXIDE POISONING AND THAT IS HARDLY LIKELY ONLY A FEW DRIVERS EVER  HAD THAT HAPPEN TO THEM SO I SAY KEEP ON RACING BOYS  BOOGEDY BOOGEDY BOOGEDY

  10. Yep, they sure should. There's nothing like setting at a racetrack and  smelling the fumes & burning rubber. It's all part of the experience that I love.

  11. YES they should..so shut your mouf...shut your mouf ryecch nyow!!

    your fruiter than a bowl of froot loops, fruity pebbles and richard simmons all wrapped up with a rainbow ribbon while "what what in my butt" plays

  12. What? It's just NASCAR polluting the Earth and that's it? Why don't you go stop by Beijing and see how it is there?

  13. Yes...and send all the water from the melted ICE CAPS to Georgia.

  14. Should the EPA allow you to f**t,breathe,drive to work,use butane to cook,BBQ,light a bonfire,shoot a gun,or maybe light a cigar. WELL h**l YES. If we worry about everything the EPA says we can't do, then we just assume die. Because we would not be living happy lives. So go green on an island somewhere and leave us NASCAR FANS alone. How do you like them apples.

  15. yes. they should also make sure that all people trying to fight global warming are able to form intelligible sentences.

  16. Should the EPA ban anything that pollutes the environment, thereby plunging the world into economic chaos?

  17. Yes, they should.  There's a lot of unregulated blowing going on.  NASCAR should be allowed to have their fair share.

  18. 43 cars running for 4 hours isn't going to make the earth burn up.

  19. they don't even build ozone depleting NASCARS

    Cars only cause air-pollution. NASA pokes holes in our atmosphere with spacecraft, and the EPA doesn't stop them.  Now if Toyota built an ozone depleting NASCARS, that would be a different story, because you know... those Japanese don't even use the EPA, and they like to ride bicycles over there. As far as global warming goes, if anybody knew the trends, before the last ice age there was an increase in the earths temperature, and also less than a century ago parts of North America experienced an almost twelve month winter. The trends in weather patterns dictate that we may see another ice age within less than two hundred years. You would be better off worrying about a giant meteor hitting Earth.

  20. Global warming is as real as the Easter Bunny and Santa Clause. They're not hurting anything.

  21. Like OMG, it would be like SOOOOOOOO superbly amazing if the EPA could focus all their like, total attention on NASCAR ,and have like, no bigger fish to fry. LIKE TOTALLY !!!! LOL!!!!

  22. Im sure Nascar and the Epa  could try   but they dont care

  23. Should the EPA let cows f**t because they contribute to global warming with all the methane they produce.

  24. Yes...as long as there are cars/trucks/trains/planes and let's not forget rockets {!!!!!} that are in use.  

  25. Has NOT been proven exhaust is part of global warming. Cow flatulence is supposedly more harmful.

    Never heard of Nascars. I do know NASCAR.

  26. Yes, get over it. We have far bigger issues than Nascar. Go focus on those.

  27. Well, they do.

    And yes they should.

    So there.

  28. im sure there are more causes of global warming than nascar.we are all doomed anyway so it dont make no difference.us redneck,white trash want our nascar even if it blows up the planet (as long as its after the race)

  29. Now you want them regulating blowing?

    Global warming is a farce.

  30. Class A, I am going to go on faith that this question is not your opinion and you are just asking for your knowledge.  You know how I get about environmentalists with my speeches.

    NO SPEECH TODAY, SO MY ANSWER IS YES!

  31. Definitely !!!! They are stimulating the economy and employing thousands of people ,so their carbon footprint is probably negative when you factor all of that in ! If you are that worried about it start walking and quit using electricity .Also grow your own food.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 31 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.