Wouldn't that be a drastic measure inappropriate in a free country with a free market ?
Instead of banning bottled water, shouldn't we put a deposit of let's say 25 cents or 50 cents per bottle to make sure they will be returned ?
I generally don't drink bottled water, but I don't want the government to reduce my economic freedoms and force me to drink faucet water. Sometimes I want or need bottled water and I find it a security that I can buy bottled water in case faucet water has a problem.
I find it's dangerous to ban bottled water and blame the plastic bottle. And I think it's hypocritical also, given that all the soft drinks and even milks are sold in plastic bottle in far greater quantity.
Why single out water ?
Tags: