Should I get a peavey valveking halfstack or a peavey windsor half-stack?

Question

what are some major differences between ther 2? which would you suggest for someone who is going to play blues and rock.

Also im only 14 and im looking for a job but without a job i only make $80 a month.

so consider that the windsor is $649 and the valveking is $949

please dont tell me about other amps i am set between these two.

Answer 1

DUDE, PAY ATTENTION. I HAVE THE VALVEKING, AND SELLING IT ON EBAY B/C IT SUCKS. I HAVE PLAYED THE WINDSOR IN GC AND IS NOT WORTH THE MONEY

THE MARSHALL HALFSTACK, WHICH I USE IN 50% OF MY GIGS, IS AWESOME.

149$ LESS THAN THE WINDSOR AND 350 LESS THAN THE VALVEKING WHIC IS A PIECE OF ****.

Answer 2

if one amp is tube and the other is not... the tube amp will sound better...

Answer 3

dont buy a peavy at all thats taking the cheap way out. they suck. i reccomend Krank amps. they have a reasonably priced half stack with a head that blows any peavy out of the water. if not i use a line-6 half stack. they are a little expensive though.

Answer 4

Peavey's suck to begin with.

Sound quality is bad.

So getting either no matter what their differences are, is a waste of money.

Answer 5

go with the valve king its more versitile plus it ha a decent reverb. the windsor is just a single channel amp which you can get a few different sound from it but no versitility in it. Unless you can find a peavet ultra plus an ebay craigslis for the same price.