Should I trade David Garrard, Reggie Williams, and Willie Parker for Marion Barber?

Question

I already have Tom Brady. Andre Johnson, and Marquez Colston

Answer 1

close decision but id say no your loosing allot of depth in your roster and willie parker is very good anyways

Answer 2

yes do because williams is now out for williams is out for awhile now(diferen't one) so garrad's status goes down, parker is good but now has to share carrries with reshard mendenhall,williamsis the only decnt player their but barber is consitentyes do the trade

Answer 3

I wouldn't if i had that, Willie Parker is an elite back, Garrard is a good back-up in case Brady goes down.  Barber is a good back but he will probably be splitting some of the carries with Felix Jones.  

Answer 4

No that is too high of a price garrard is a good qb parker is a good rb and williams can do some stuff. marion barber is just as good as parker and williams.

Answer 5

YES! i dont like marion barber but he is bomb. he will be one of the top rb this year...

parker cant score tds and he isnt projected to do so great this year.

David Garrard you wont be needing if you already have brady...and dont worry about brady getting injured cuz he wont

and reggie williams wont do so hot either....good luck

Answer 6

Without knowing anything more about your team than what you've already posted, I would have to say yes, its a good trade.

I really like Garrard to have a good year, and I even think he could develop into a top 10 fantasy QB (although with his new receiving corps looking to miss extended time that seems more unlikely), but he's not going to touch what Brady will likely put up this year.  Reggie Williams is not more than a #3 WR right now and isn't likely to rise beyond that this year, and I don't think he's going to duplicate his TD totals from last year.  Parker is still the #1 in Pittsburgh, but he's never been a TD machine, whereas Barber is.  

Barber has the potential to be a top 5 RB this year, and you're only losing your backup QB, a low-end wide out, and a #2 RB.  I say accept it.