I saw this question pop up, yet again, on the news and it was a dilemma for our high school football team, as well and I honestly do not know how I feel about the decision. I should state that I am a female and a women’s right’s advocate ….
On one hand, I think that it is BS to say that someone cannot do something because that person is a woman - it pisses me off. For many sports, there is simply no good reason for not allowing us to play – when we do not have the alternative of a women’s team (like volleyball, track, basketball, baseball – non extreme contact sports).
On the other hand, however, there are some arguable circumstances, when something like a person's gender, has to be taken into account - or at least contemplated. For the most part, men are stronger (in bulk, weight and strength) than men. Not to mention, that football is a harsh, non-objective, full contact and possibly dangerous sport - for the men alone. Add a woman and the chances of injury simply does increase. There are, additionally, some emotional issues for the men to deal with, as well. Most are afraid and would be against, even if subconsciously, tackling a girl and others are a******s who -- for male pride or out of pure evil -- would try to break her into pieces every time. Either way, there would be a negative impact on their games.
Personally, I think there are enough women out there to form their own league. I played Woman's Rugby, in college, and there were plenty of people interested & I did not have to fear some giant, 200lb dude breaking my face.
Tags: