Should i start derek anderson or aaron rodgers?

Question

i think it should be anderson because he is solid and experience. He also has more options

Answer 1

Possibly the dumbest question ive ever seen. Anderson, by a landslide. Rodgers shouldn't even be on your TEAM. He isn't a top 20 QB. Unless your in a large league he shouldn't be on a roster. He is about the 28th best QB in Fantasy Football. GB will run it 45 times a game, Rodgers will throw it 12 times. Awful awful pickup on your part.  

Answer 2

It's somewhat of a tough call with anderson coming off a concussion an rodgers going against minnesota's D on monday night football. I personally see rodgers having a solid game at home on monday night but i also see anderson not doing to shabby also. See how anderson looks in practice this week an also the health of the line and the receiving core. if your feeling shaky about it...go with rodgers...again, its only week one.

goodluck

TLam

Answer 3

Derek Anderson is the man, he has more weapons

Answer 4

Well, that's not exactly true when you think about it. The Packers have some weapons on offense: RB Ryan Grant, WR James Jones, WR Donald Driver, WR Greg Jennings. Whereas the Browns have: RB Jamal Lewis, WR Braylon Edwards, TE Kellon Winslow. That's 4 options to 3 by my count, in favor of the Packers and Aaron Rodgers.

Answer 5

Whoa, whoa, whoa, hold it right there.  Anderson by FAR doesn't have more options.  The Packers have the deepest receiving core in the league.  I would know, I watch almost every game.  I'm not saying you should start Rodgers over Anderson (Anderson should start) but he doesn't have more options at WR.

Answer 6

I think your right. Anderson had a good fantasy season last year and now has even more options to throw to this season, as long as his brains don't fall out from  the head injuries.

Answer 7

Anderson for sure.  He has more experience and knows the system better.  He has a better receiving corp and a better running game to take the pressure off the pass.