Should it have been named "An Inconvenient Farce"?

Question

Should it have been named "An Inconvenient Farce"?

Answer 1

That's a great title.

or I Can't Believe It's Not Hotter

or I Invented The Internet, I Should Know

Answer 2

Time will tell, won't it?

Anyone disbelieving that humans have had an impact on global change are either in denial or their head is inserted ostrich-style into the ground.

Kudos to the men and women such as Al Gore who are trying to wake up the world to a horrific situation while there is still time to make amends.

Answer 3

no. one: it as is what?

no. two: if it refers to 'An Inconvenient Truth', no

Answer 4

Absolutely.  I find it interesting that John and Theresa Kerry are now writing a book about climate change.  It worked so well for Al, how could they pass that opportunity up?  When you consider the Al Gore/James Hanson/Heinz/Kerry relationship, it would be surprising if they DIDN'T write a book.  I think they're calling it Farce: The Sequel.

Answer 5

we havent heard from Al lately have we?????

I thought it was funny in the movie about how most of the data was given to him by "friends"

I know when I write a paper and submit data, I have to give the source

Answer 6

I bet you wouldn't say that if it had been made by Ronald Reagan instead of Al Gore.

Answer 7

That depends on how much credence you give the theories.  Happily we live in a country where you're free to call it anything you like.