Question:

Should people who preach prejudice and discrimination...?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

... be banned from jobs that allow them to abuse their power? This applies to people who are prejudiced (e.g. racist) but I am thinking mainly of feminists who promote and support anti-male ideas and laws. For example, a feminist judge has spoken openly in support of a law that allows a woman to kill a man if she feels sufficiently insulted http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1529573111/bclid1659906966/bctid1699167868

There are other examples in government e.g. http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluated

If you replace the word 'man' with 'Black person' in these feminist laws you can see there is a serious problem of discrimination being allowed to happen at all levels of our culture. My question is:

Should we allow people who hold influential jobs to use them to spread prejudice and discrimination?

 Tags:

   Report

13 ANSWERS


  1. That's Politically Incorrect!  ;)  Only men can "do wrong."  Why women are perfect, didn't ya know.  Hmm yes you have an unbeatable arguement (replacing man with Black man per the new laws.)  

    What can we do?  After all, when "they" control the vocabulary, issues that are socially accepted to talk about & the language, they have stacked the deck.  No we should not allow them to so such things.

    However, just like n**i Germany, today's populace are too cowered & afraid to speak out against the fascists.  Oh wait, I forgot, the words German n***s are verbotten to discuss.    

    People who were discriminated against in WW2 are todays

    leading n***s.  Albeit they have learned new tactics that far surpass even Goebbels imagination.  I'm tired and have to go to sleep.  Peace.      


  2. no

  3. Do you have the ability to walk on water? That's my answer.

  4. Absolutely!  It might sound a little corny to quote Uncle Ben from Spiderman here, but "with great power, comes great responsibility."  The twisted morals of racism and prejudice are irresponsible to say the least and not meant to be given a seat of prominence in a productive society.

  5. Yes, they should be banned.

    Intelligence AND Government overhead reduction, all in one move.

    Brilliant!

  6. ofcourse not


  7. Women have no business being in these sorts of jobs anyway.

  8. I agree with you completely theres alot of abuse of office but we are the ones who encourage these people because we dont cause an uproar when they do or say dumb things like i get so bothered with rap artistes promoting a gun toting culture and murder but people still buy their music a guy calls women bitc**es but women go and buy that music it breaks my heart

  9. girls rag dude! lol

    jus deal with it, really because you love em at the end of the day anyway..=)

  10. No we should not, I agree with you that discrimination in any form should not be tolerated in or out of the work place. Judges with that mind set should not be permitted to hold such a position because she has the power to inflict harm on undeserving people for no other reason than their gender.

  11. Who know how many of them there are in less prominent but powerful positions??

    Their minions don't seem to see anything particularly wrong or do but won't take a stand and just point the finger elsewhere.

    The ongoing hate speech and propaganda has decent people accepting this kind of thing and I've yet to hear any opposition from anyone of any real influence.

    This is odd, watching fascism raise its head in Europe, in time the masses will turn around and wonder,"how the f**k did we get here?"

    The answer will be, "one law at a time while we were fighting amongst ourselves".

  12. we can`t do anything, but some other organs has the power to do that.

    if someone gives a prejudged or wrong decision in his job he will be judged  by these audition organs. so is something like chain.and if the low gives them spaces to do such things, we must rise our voice, to be heard to these organs.

    but such things happened and will happen all the time, so...

  13. yeah, but how would the interviewers even find out?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 13 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions