Should teens who murder be executed?

Question

I did this for a paper and wanted to hear peoples opinion. While answering this question also think about 10 years ago when DNA evidence wasn't that effective. Innocent juveniles were killed when they shouldn't of. Today over 15 people on death row have been free because of DNA evidence being more reliable.

Answer 1

ok the 13 year old let me ask you this are you able to know right from wrong by now do you know that killing someone is bad you know you do i am 18 and i am doing a paper on this and i do think that we all should because you are considered a teenager from 13 to 20 at 21 you are considered to be an adult and anyone 13 to 20 that commits murder should recieve the same punshiment as anyone else and im not talking about if they do it in self deffense because that is a completly different catagory and manslaught involuntary or not should still be punishable by death dosent matter what age they are and let me ask you this if you were the parent of a kid that was killed by a teenage that was 14 you wouldnt want them dead and if your brother or sister was killed by a 13 year old teenager your saying you wouldnt care or wouldnt want the worse punishment for them.

Answer 2

Ummm im doing a report on this and i think they shouldnt. there should be an age limit to the death penalty . im 13 by the way .. i guess im very accurate in things..  ummm if the teens are above 17-18 they should be executed . no doubt. if a 13-17 year old commits unnecessary murder that shouldnt require death. its not required and i dont think it should happen