Should the Olympics of 2016 be in Chicago or Rio de Janeiro?

Question

I wouldn't mind the Olympics being right next door ;]

=]<3

Answer 1

Rio de Janeiro Is my vote

Chicago will be if we can clean up our domestic problems and lower our dependency on oil by 80%  

Answer 2

Rio!!

Answer 3

i think rio would be better, for it&#039;s location.

Answer 4

Rio de Janeiro,   it would be horrible if they were in Chicago

Answer 5

Rio

Answer 6

Defintely not in the U.S.A as they have had their share in recent times, and I would not like to see them get it again so soon after the L.A. and Atlanta games.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) announced in June that Chicago (USA), Tokyo (Japan), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), and Madrid (Spain) have made it on to the shortlist of cities bidding to host the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Given that South America has never hosted an Olympic Games I would suggest that Rio is the most derserving. I hope they get it.

Answer 7

Rio de Janeiro?? No way! Chicago please!

Answer 8

Rio would be interesting.  

Answer 9

Either Rio or Tokyo. The US hosted the Summer Olympics in 1984 (LA) and 1996 (Atlanta) and the Winter ones (Salt Lake City) in 2002. Having them in the same country four times in less than 35 years is ridiculous.

Rio would be fabulous, I can totally see it being one big party.

Answer 10

Rio they would throw such  a party it would be so cool

Answer 11

Chicago because I am from Chicago.

Answer 12

Rio de Janeiro! I would like to see those Brazilian fans go crazy!