Should the USA use the threat of a nuclear attack against Sudan's government to stop the genocide in Darfur?

Question

After making it crystal clear to China and Russia that genocide will simply not be tolerated.

Answer 1

The problem has been around for decades. during the Clinton admin. Hillary and a handful of delegates had promised the countries and the world that genocide would never happen again.

Well I guess no one really cares..the country doesn't have any resources the world needs or wants.

I suppose there is a price on life.

Answer 2

It is amazing how a third world nation can destroy millions of its people while the west stands by and does nothing.  The only reason is that this country does not have any natural resources that the west thirsts.  The USA cannot declare nuclear attack as the victims will be victimized again.  The solution is also not as simple as South Africa which had some very good natural resources which can be boycotted.  I would love for Bono to come up with a solution.

Answer 3

ROFL

Sounds like a solution by Dumbya and his d**k: "Stop killing each other or we'll kill you all!"

If only there were oil for Halliburton to steal at Darfur, or a way to launder money for Blackwater, Dumbya and his d**k would have sent the troops to handle that crisis, but this way, why would they care?

Answer 4

Yes and no. I say yes because at this point I would agree to anything that can stop whats been going on in Darfur, but no, because it would put the U.S. in a really bad situation with other countries, etc. They will just return the threath