Should the science educated, young separate ourselves from those non science educated people.?

Question

most science educated are young adults. most of those educated in science do not work for money. they work because they have true desire to help the world. they are allowed to tap into a higher plane of existence.

meanwhile, the non science people are spreading racism, division, with their consumption attitude. polluting the environment and not contributing.

the negative non science educated people are miserable to live around and detract from the quality of life.

strong science education = positivity

strong opinion indoctrination = negativity

p.s. maybe that is why a certain female candidate is so negative. lack of science education. too much opinion indoctrination. what a shame.

should we separate ourselves and resist extinction or continue to try to save those that do not want to help humanity and just want to destroy everything and everyone. then beg for help once its too late ??

p.s. all racist. from all tribes should be put on an island away from scientist.

Answer 1

Your "better than everyone else" attitude" is racist in itself.  I don't see you better than me or me better than you.    I want and do my part to help the humanity.  I am a school teacher who daily deals with and tries to help children deal with racist attitudes towards others.  You do not need to be a scientist to do this.  It is about compassion and a willingness to do what is right.

Answer 2

We should encourage more science and less religion in our schools. Religious schools shouldn't be government funded.

Answer 3

I don't think you can say that most people who work outside of science are greedy and spreading racism, etc.  Yes some people are greedy and etc.  but not all are.  There are some (non-scientific) persons who are working for social justice and a better environment.  I've seen people work for civil rights bills, for legislation that fight discrimination, and other people who have fought to help clean our environment (fighting for bills that do).  These people I've seen are non-scientific.  They aren't miserable nor racist.  They are good people.  One can't generalize all people into several characteristics.

Plus there are some in science who aren't positive.  Back in the 1930s (and before), science was wrongly used to prove racist theories.  Eugenics was high during this era.

Of course not ALL scientists are bad.  But there are some that are unethical too.  No one is perfect.