Should the snotty Prince William (Wilhelm) be allowed to use a tax payers helicopter, for in in their language

Question

'gadding' about to Royal palaces, stag nights and general showing off. does the the buffoon not realise that the nation of Great Britain paid for his training.. I think the Windsors, sorry, Saxe-Coberg- Gotha, come Battenbergers, should repay the cost of this insanity.

Answer 1

This poo bag oozes with slime and of privilege, as Shakespeare scribed. 'Go,for Gods sake go.' Back to their Fatherland. One of the cretins is the daughter of a Waffen SS general, and we all know what they did to Allied prisoners and poor civilians. they are monsters....

Answer 2

I agree with you....

Answer 3

Prince William is a part of the Royal family and that ol Monarchy that he's in is essentially the backbone of british society. I should think you'd have a whole lot more to worry about if that family were taken away.

And this is just my opinion but I don't think they 'owe' us anything. The Monarchy IS England and England IS the Monarchy, that's the way it's been for a thousand years and the country's prospered. I only wish it could continue for a thousand more, but people don't seem to grasp the bigger picture anymore and just see the Royal family as some superfluous drain of money, which is ridiculous.

Plus to be honest, I think the taxpayers could be paying for worse things.

Answer 4

i think most brits would be inclined to agree, they should disband the royal family, and save billions in tax dollars, they are just a bunch of rich snobs, playboys and old battle axes that have lived off their lineage for too long, the old girl is just a figure head to begin with, tradition, the country could run just as well without her and her obnoxious family, especially prince dog face and his dog face woman

Answer 5

I understood the last word - "insanity".  It describes what you are suffering from perfectly.

Answer 6

of course he shouldn't but you try ringing the RAF and ask for a lift and see what answer you get they are a load of spongers who the country could do without

Answer 7

The ACTUAL cost per person, in the UK, to support the Royal Family, works out to .......................Wait for it !!!

One pound 25 p , EACH person, PER YEAR . Or put another way, a  small drink at the local pub.

By the way, when was the last time that a US President's son was a serving officer in their military services ? About   60 years ago, in WW2. Son of FDR served in the US Army in Normandy.

Second point, EVERY male royal serves in the  British forces, and even the current Queen, Elizabeth  drove   an ambulance during the Blitz in London,  in WW2, as  a young member of the Auxillary Transport corps, and SHE fixed  and maintained it, too.

.

Jim B. Toronto.

Answer 8

I think you have hit the nail on the head Wat. this toerag rich upstart has been sodding about with an RAF helicopter to show off to his Eton/ Harrow Rupert shites. His ' naughty little escapades' have cost our nation 50 grand, enough to keep 25,000 poor pensioners warm this winter. make these krauts pay back the money to the citizens of our islands. Like many people who are here who shouldn't be, the so called Royals are among them.

Answer 9

yawn, change the record.

Answer 10

I do believe the Royals can afford to pay for their own helicopter and the people should not pay for their extravagances any longer

Answer 11

This is one example of the many hidden costs of having a monarchy..Forty million my cute erse

Answer 12

prince who?

Answer 13

For someone so insignificant,you certainly are mouthy.

Answer 14

Like their father(s),the pair of them are a total waste of space!

Answer 15

if you take the royal family away then you take a major part of the worlds interest in britain away,dont you see this.

Answer 16

You`re a republican a*rsehole then I take it?

Answer 17

Absolutely! And further, if he wants to indulge himself in a few more activities which are beyond the usual, I believe he should. He's in line to do an appallingly intrusive, exacting and cringingly public job which might even be life-threateningly dangerous. I think he deserves all the perks he can get.

Answer 18

Ugh, i can't stand the royal family and this whole helicopter stupidity just reinforces why i can't stand them. No he shouldn't. Drive, get a bus, walk if you have to. Quit trying to show off because you can fly a helicopter. I'm just waiting on my reimbursement from the tax office for that little charade.

Answer 19

I am growing quite weary of people who misuse this thread to post their rantings and ravings.

First things first: His name is William.His MOTHER was Diana,daughter of Earl Spencer;they were English.William's great-grandmother,Elizabeth,the Queen Mother,was from a proud Scotts family.So,be an intelligent person and drop the XENOPHOBIC act.

Military training is paid for by the tax payers for EVERYONE entering the service.

And,yes,it would be a good idea for William to pay for the use of the helicopter for PRIVATE business;but if he had garnered permission to use the helicopter while he was also  en route to performing military service,a partial paymet for fuel  used on the extra stop would be sufficient.

Xenophobics are the real buffoons.

George V changed the family name to Windsor in 1917 to show solidarity with the British people.He changed the name to reflect that the family served the United Kingdom.He changed the name to show that he did not have family solidarity with his first cousin,who bombed England.George V listened to his people,and to assuage anti-German sentiment,he changed the name.

The family has become more diverse with the marriages of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon,Diana Spencer,Katherine Worsley,Sarah Fergusson,Sophie Rhys-Jones,and others.

And as for you:

If there wern't a royal family,you would be complaining about any one who is rich,who is in government,who is more fortunate than you are. We all envy the things we don't have.

Answer 20

their a ***** embarrassment to this nation.. Kings,Queens, Princess & Princes. *** me do they actually **** and f**t or wot.... get rid as soon as pos!!!!!!!

Answer 21

You seem almost insanely reactionary.

- I thought the sentiment that the royal family are essentially "Germans"  was settled 90 years ago when they changed their name from Saxe-Coberg- Gotha to Windsor.

  I am also under the impression that the cost of the royal family is around £40 million per year (not billions). That's £40 million for country with population of 60 million.

    Some percentage of the  ÃƒÂ‚£15000 million a year that international tourists spend in the UK is related to worldwide fascination with the British monarchy. If you abolish the monarchy I bet you find that at least 5%-10% of those people go to Italy where its warmer.

Answer 22

no, he's a complete b*****d and im fed up with everyone going on about global warming, but nobody asks them to stop flying a helicopter back and forth just to visit their family, why can't they use a train. I think we should get rid of the monarchy, they don't do anything but take tax payers money and get drunk.