Should there be an all-out nuclear war among a few countries, what are the possible consequences???

Question

Here's a chance to prevent such an event by reflecting and provide suggestions. Appreciate good answers!

Answer 1

Nuclear bombs don't exist, video footage of tests were faked like the lunar landings.  

The powers that be actually prefer people killing each other the old fashioned way, on the battle field, or in city streets as is increasingly seen to be the case these days.

You're in h**l people, you'd better start figuring out who are the Satan's  little helpers poking you with pitchforks.  Better still figure out who is Satan himself.  He's closer to home than you might have imagined.

Answer 2

The death of the micro man (along with their limited views on open love and acceptance that everything that happens is their own fault) and the rise of the Macro man (With their views of a loving acceptance of the hand they've been dealt and a oneness of all humans and therefore no need for war and nuclear weapons)

Answer 3

I've often thought about this. I'm assuming here the targets are USA, and the Middle East.

Obviously the target area is immediately destroyed, and the radius around that would see immediate serious illness in the population from the radiation poisoning. Food sources such as plants and farm animals would die causing food shortage, the water would be contaminated. Any contaminated rivers would contaminate the lakes and oceanside nearby. If we're talking about places like the USA, we'd then be unable to export food to nations that we aid and sell to, which would create trickle down food shortages. There would also be a fuel shortage should the Middle East suppliers be targeted.

Besides that, the fallout gasses would make their way up into the atmosphere and contaminate countries nearby the original target and we'd see spikes of cancer and birth defects for hundreds, if not thousands of miles around the target site eventually.

Straight up, it would be disasterous for the entire planet's population.

Answer 4

One of the definite consequences will be the most screwed up weather patterns you could ever imagine.

There is NO chance to prevent such an event by reflecting and provide suggestions.  It IS going to happen!

Answer 5

A nuclear winter . Radiation poising of most of the world . But, if this coming world wide depression comes first their will not be one . For the finances will not be there to carry out such a war .

Answer 6

If everybody is curious enough to find out the consequences then there will be a nuclear war some day.

Somebody may just press that trigger out of boredom - "hey, let's just do it and see what happens!!!"

I think our curiousity was more than satisfied (till we were all totally nauseated) after Hiroshima and Nagasaki

I am surprised that research on nuclear weapons not only continued but reached new heights after that

And it was you and me who paid for it too

Answer 7

As far as I know, Iran is testing their nuclear weapons that angers the powerful countries in the world.

I do believe that there is a great possibility that there would be an all-out nuclear war if things get worse. And if that happens, people would surely suffer no matter how far they are from the targeted area.

Answer 8

There would be no consequences, the world would be unable to hold any, let alone itself together stably.

Answer 9

"The 4th World War will be fought with bows and arrows". -- Albert Einstein

Answer 10

I don't think I understand the question - should there be a war? - of course not! (or are you asking, will there be a war?)

Make it world wide law to destroy all nuclear weapons of course.

Answer 11

I think that a modern nuclear war wouldn't be anything similar to what it would have been in the cold war. In the cold war there were two countries that each had enough nuclear devices and the intent to destroy the other. Now most countries have half a dozen bomb and the rest of the world nagging them, if ineffectually, not to make more.

Chances are if one country detonates a nuclear device it will be one or two small ones turning a few cities into smouldering, radioactive craters. Any nation that does this will open themselves up to an almost unilateral conventional retalliation, but it's unlikely that any country will initiate a nuclear response. People are just too scared of atomic weaponry for it to happen. All those years of propoganda about nuclear holocaust really did its job.

A few nukes going off on the other side of the world might cause a slight increase in thyroid cancer over the next twenty years, but, other than hundreds or thousands or millions of people having died, I don't think a nuclear war would effect many of us one bit.

Answer 12

no there shouldn't because the most likely outcome would be world wide terror and destruction...... hehe....

cause even though it would be among a few countries, its hard to contain nuclear stuff... and every country is important.

its just a bad idea, what would it solve?