Question:

Should there be "interference" for PPV matches?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

One Summerslam match down, one match with outside interference already. At Wrestlemania, you can be certain that all matches will be "legit", making it much more exciting for the fans. For the price of PPV, should the interference be left for RAW and Smackdown?...at least at the other major PPV's like Summerslam, Survivor Series, and Royal Rumble. My vote is YES, I know it is part of the entertainment...but it pisses me off that a match that was as good as Hardy's and MVP's has to be ruined at the end. Same happened to a really good Batista/C.M. Punk match last PPV. That can't be what fans really want...right??

 Tags:

   Report

3 ANSWERS


  1. i agree you should not pay 40 buks for a ppv and see a match be interfered with. they should leave the interference for the tv shows


  2. NO INTERFERENCE SHOULD BE FOR RAW AND SMACKDOWN

    TO BUILD TOWARDS THE PPV

    PPV SHOULD BE USED TO FINISH FEUDS

  3. I think we should leave this decision up to the WWE writers...

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 3 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.