Should third umpires now use footage from the 1000 frame/second cameras to adjudicate on stumpings/run-outs?

Question

Should third umpires now use footage from the 1000 frame/second cameras to adjudicate on stumpings/run-outs?

Answer 1

Nope. It would slow down the game while they decided, ruin the flow, and make it boring to watch. Oh. Wait. You're talking about cricket, and it is slow and boring to watch. So it wouldn't make a difference.

Answer 2

NO!!!!

I have never agreed with the third umpire.

Traditional; decisions were the best.

That's the game.

Answer 3

???????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????????...

Answer 4

I think it's a great idea Joey..

It would make things a lot clearer for them,no more going through the same replay 10 times to find nothing..

Yes with Frames per seconds it would stop a lot of whinging..That's only if it is refered to the third umpire anyway...

Answer 5

sure should take out any questions

Answer 6

I don't quite understand why they don't in the first place.

Answer 7

I guess you are talk about cricket - I don't believe that any spot should have video umpires

Answer 8

yes

Answer 9

yes.to answer or give good judgement it is needed

Answer 10

Oh yes thats a great idea Joey, i for one am sick of the replaying in slow motion and they have got it wrong plenty of times too!  LOL

:)

Answer 11

off course he can do it.

Hey My dear friend u know i m watching all Cricket Tournament on a site. last day i watched India vs Pakistan Match. Wow what a site. U know this site always provide batter quality of sound & video. such a great site. i m loving it. U have to try it once. Tomorrow ill watch India vs Bangladesh Match.

http://www.bhejafry.net/livesports.php

http://www.bhejafry.net/

Answer 12

Thinking back over recent matches where a certain country were unwilling to accept the umpire's decision, & their fans cried foul every time their players were dismissed, I think it should be used.

Answer 13

I think it's fine just the way it is. They should just refer it to the third umpire more.