Should we have a man who earned his living as a slave trader on the $20?

Question

Andrew "jacka*s" Jackson earned his living as a slave trader from 1804 to 1813.

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13009

"Nevertheless, from 1804 until 1813 he successfully combined

with planting and the stock-raising business enterprises of a larger

sort, especially slave and horse dealing."

We are not talking about a plantation owner who owned slaves like Washington or Jefferson here, we are talking about a guy who made his living as a Slave Trader.

Eventually Jackson did own a plantation with 140 slaves, but, from 1804 to 1813 he made his living as a slave trader.

Answer 1

Maybe we demote him to the $10 bill then?

Answer 2

me no get it

i have absolutelly no idea what u r trying too say

Answer 3

ex post facto laws are prohibited in federal law by Article I, section 9 of the U.S. Constitution

As long as you reinventing the law why not knock of the second Amendment too so we can't defend our self's from Government

Answer 4

no

Answer 5

yes . in fact if you have a problem with your 20s I can take then off your hands