Question:

Should we really support our 400 metre drugs cheat?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

She goes for gold soon in the Womens 4oo Metres but after a ban or 3 missed tests should she really be allowed to the Olympics. Who knows what she was taking or hiding and missing 3 tests is a bit too much. She is also rarely seen on the Grand prix circuit too which is where most test are carried out . Cheat or Champ? I say cheat!

 Tags:

   Report

6 ANSWERS


  1. There is no evidence she ever cheated since she has never had a positive test, and despite missed tests, she still attended other tests during the period in question.


  2. No way should she be allowed to compete, wrong message going out to future athletes me thinks.

  3. Brilliant question.  No we shouldn't support her, she has cheated before so is obviously that type of person so she won't be getting my support.  The Olympics have been fantastic so far and this win at all costs mentality is wrong and should be shown as being wrong to the young up and coming athletes, Imagine loosing your place in TEAM GB to someone who has used drugs to get better, Its wrong

  4. No No No

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  5. There should be a blanket ban on any athlete that has ever tested positive and proved guilty.  They should be banned from ever competing again in the Olympic arena.  A deliberate missed test is tantamount to being guilty.

  6. You need to get more information mate. She is not guilty of taking drugs. Obviously from your question you know that. The new testing system in this country (UK) has been shambolically  introduced. You need to listen to what Darren Cambell has to say on the subject and you would have to change your mind. Find the source yourself if you're that concerned, you sad t**t.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 6 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions