Being as they both play in E. Rutherford New Jersey, don't you think that one of the franchises should honor them with one of those teams? They are the only teams in the NFL to share a stadium and they're in arguably the biggest market for sports in America. I never understood how they could be called the New York Giants OR Jets and not have a stadium in New York. I know Dallas doesn't play in Dallas, but at least it's still in the same state.They used to play in the Polo Grounds way back in the day, then the Giants played in Yankee Stadium and the Jets in Shea, but BOTH decided to move out of NY entirely. Besides, NJ has every major sport besides baseball, they have Rutgers which is a great football college, and they DO play in New Jersey. I live in Rhode Island so it really doesn't make a difference to me (plus I'm an Eagles fan), but I just think it's disrespectful to New Jersey to allow not one, but TWO teams to play in your state and not have at least ONE of them be named after your state. Cheap @$$ owners if you ask me. They won't even build another stadium in NY although they'll CERTAINLY take the money. No major team that play the same sport should be in the same building. That goes for the Lakers and Clippers too. What are your opinions?
Tags: