Shouldn't communications between banks and their customers be through e-mails?

Question

How can one be trusted in Court if there isn't a hardcopy or an audio file of a crucial chat between a Bank official and one of his account owners?

Answer 1

Due to the fact that emails can be hacked and that so much is involved in internet use, it has been decided in the best interest of both parties if emails did not contain personal information.

  

   If you are in the big of a situation with a bank that you need hard copies for court, then you should set up an appointment with a bank manager and bring your lawyer along for the discussion.

It would be easier through email but I understand that it is for my protection too that they do not allow emailing of sensitive materials.

Answer 2

Well it beats telepathy bro

Answer 3

Many banks now provide an email like communication system in their internet portal.  It is not actual email, as email is like sending a postcard through the mail.  Anybody along the transmission can read it.  Privacy is a concern with banking, so sending personal information via email is highly discouraged.  If banks do send a communication via email, it's generally a link to a secure website that allows you to see the full communication along with your personal information.

Conversations with banks can be followed up with FAXing of documents (letters) between you and the bank.  This is also a secure method of sending personal information.

Answer 4

Yes, I would believe an interesting idea is bank communications through emails regardless of the troublemakers(hackers, phreakers, cryptographers, etc) out there... the placement of the emails would be good enough besides the hacks....

plus very enviromental friendly(energy.. ) , I am tired of going deaf from people that are tree huggers!

good luck on your idea