Shouldn't we ban smoking outdoors except at the north & south poles,and even there if there are animals around

Question

I agree that smoking at the south and north poles should cease when the populations there increase, but that leaves a few years for the smoking nuts to go there if they have no will-power or good sense!

Answer 1

Then people would just smoke in their homes, so that wouldn't really change much

Answer 2

While you are banning smoking lets add fast foods, junk food (obesity), coffee, MP3 player and ipods(ruining your hearing) skate boards(broken bones) teenage drivers (too many accidents) cell phones(cancer) big and little dogs(biting people)  and the list is endless.  How people chose to live their lives is their business.

Answer 3

get real...us smokers are here to stay...whether you non-smokers like it or not

as for the animals being around...what's with that?

i don't force anyone to smoke, what gives you the right to force me not to smoke?

i know, i know...you are going to say something about the 'pollution' it causes or the second hand smoke

the pollution is so very minimal compared to the factories that help produce food to feed people...what ya gonna do? shut them down, too? and the second hand smoke...you don't get any if smokers smoke outside