Shouldn't we delete this question?...?

Question

.xty from what was described the boy was 13 or so, expresed his curiousity , so a 30+ year old adult felt free to HOSPITALIZE him with injury. (I'm thinking since you dont HAVE testacles you re not aware of how serious it can be to have them smashed like that. He needd hospital!)

Answer 1

LOL! - No!

Edit

Anyone who takes that post seriously is too young to be able to swing a kick high enough. I wouldn't worry about it - its just someone wasting their right to free speech.

Edit

Mac - people who have been on G&WS for a while know about the guy from New Jersey who constantly posts spoofs about men getting kicked in the toddlers. I used to fall for it too - don't worry about it.

Answer 2

You don't believe it, do you?

ETA:  why not delete this one, too?  Neither one actually happened.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

ETA#2:  it's not a ha ha situation, not by any means.  But there are so many trolls and fetishists here that it's hard to take seriously the same story told over and over and over again.  I read newspapers, magazines and blogs and watch the news and news programs every day, and the only place this kind of thing shows up is here.

IF it's true, it's simply not feminism's fault.  Feminism is not responsible for teenyboppers thinking it's okay to hit anybody at any time for any reason.

Answer 3

Society condones this way of thinking. Thanks to Feminism.

Answer 4

NO

Answer 5

were you the teenager? If so stop wasting time on Y/A and report this blatant assault!

*manipulation sucks*

Answer 6

Nobody has the right to hurt another person.

Answer 7

The poster is a male troll who gets his jollies fantasizing about a teenage boy being kicked in the testicles by an adult woman. He posts here on a daily basis, in many guises, trying to get people to describe kicking or being kicked, so he can fulfill his fetish and spank his monkey in the comfort of his home.  Sometimes he pretends to be a "mother" who kicks her "son," other times he makes up improbably scenarios like that one.

GWS regulars are used to him.

Answer 8

I'm in favor of total free speech. If you don't like the question, simply move on and go to another question.

Answer 9

why ?

Answer 10

Decaf!

Answer 11

Uh NO.  What, should we delete every question that we don't agree with?  That's so childish and small-minded.

EDIT: No, I'm not FOR child abuse, and I'm sure it's obvious.  Do you watch TV at all?  Woman hits man=Hit sitcom. Man hits woman=Lifetime Movie.  My point is that the original poster was not laughing because a kid got hurt, they were laughing at the absurdity of the whole situation.  I'm not condoning what happened at all, but the action was not completely unprovoked.

To xty: Any "self-respecting woman" uses her words and doesn't resort to childish behavior like kicking or lashing out physically in any other fashion.  Only babies and immature losers have to get physically violent when things don't go their way.

Answer 12

It's a troll with a fetish, possibly the guy from New Jersey using yet another account.  It's not real.

Answer 13

Violence should never be condoned, although the boy was being inappropriate and he should expect it from a self-respecting woman.

I'm not laughing, but I'm not surprised.

Answer 14

no, what she did was assault and battery( in my state it would be"with a deadly weapon if she had her shoe on the kicking foot but I would have laughed my butt off if I would have seen it. The law may be the law but sometimes it is fun to watch a jerk get served.

there is nothing wrong with the question, it just stirs up emotions. Censoring questions can be a slippery slope