Question:

So, it looks like the Pro McCanns such as?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Saturnfive, faith, Lexy to name but a few have been proven right.

The Old McCann haters such as 17PDR and the fool known as Dave s have all had to eat there nasty accusations etc.

Always knew they would in the end.

Is it now time for them to make an aplogy for all the unfounded garbage they came out with ?

 Tags:

   Report

20 ANSWERS


  1. Hey,   "Judge John Knacker ", will you supervise this  ???

    "I, Red Chrome, being of sound mind (some like 'michael w' would disagree) hereby declare that he shall apologize for NOTHING that he has said during the last 12 months about his perception the McCann case"

    SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED AT THE FEET OF "michael w", the King.... EMPEROR... of the pro McCanns, this twenty-first day of July in the year of Our Lord of 2008"

             -----------

    But,   hang on... there is no reason yet for anyone to eat hats, LOL.  Take your prismatic glasses and join reality....

    (1) The 'arguido'  label has been removed from the McCanns BUT ALSO FROM MURAT !!     And...

    (2)  more importantly, the arguido label has been removed BECAUSE THE CASE is being filed !!   Not because the authorities have decided the McCanns are innocent. Not because the world suddenly realise they are innocent.

    There is nothing for the McCanns or anyone to celebrate !!

    I doubt very much that the Portuguese police will allow the McCanns to access their files to mock, discredit and poke fingers at them.   If the files are to be made public,  then it's not only the McCanns who can access it but EVERYONE !!  No doubt the McCanns will use that opportunity to look in the files  to shift the blame for their disgraceful behaviour on to the shoulders of others, namely......  well, namely everyone but themselves, really, LOL... like Murat and Amaral.  

    For a start there is a book being published by Amaral himself.  If freedom of the press is the reason for so much being said and done (quite rightly) then Amaral has a right to give his side of the story.  And, to be honest,  I am at this stage much more interested in that policeman's side of the story. We've listened to the McCanns millions of times during the last 12 months.  It is time we hear the other side of the story.

    By the way... calling me   'pro'  or  'anti'   McCann is a bit moronic, sorry.  I love TRUTH and hate things like BIAS and COVERUPs.

    I believe the PJ have filed the case as in something like this:

    "WHAT, THEY DON'T WANNA COOPERATE ? -THEY DON'T WANT TO COME TO PORTUGAL AND TAKE PART IN THE RECONSTRUCTION ? ---EVERY TIME WE COME CLOSE THEY FLEE TO ANOTHER COUNTRY ?  WE HAVE HAD NOTHING BUT NON-COOPERATION(?)--- SO THERE IS NOTHING ELSE FOR US TO DO BUT TO STOP THIS WASTING OF OUR TIME AND STOP THIS CHARADE AND FILE THE CASE !"

    Finally the McCanns have not been cleared of anything. Only courts can clear someone of civil liability or find someone innocent in criminal law cases.  The McCanns fif none of these two.  The PJ were prevented, from the start,  from proceeding with their investigation and of conducting their own investigation. I think tired of the case, they filed it.  They have not and will never apologise to the McCanns.

    I think the McCanns remain scared. That's why they are anxious to get their hands on the police files. If they believe the kid was abducted, what the h**l are they hoping to find in those files, files from a police force that say and believe that there was no abduction  ?  The only possible purpose can only be to credit themselves at the cost of discrediting the PJ.

    This case is getting cuter by the minute.

    Let Amaral speak and allow us to make up our own minds  !!

    Amaral was not allowed to speak for a year.  He can now.  Good for him !!

    Thank  you ' seven '  (have another read, 'seven'....  I have added a bit more, LOL)


  2. why has madeline been found safe and sound ?

    thought not

    edit

    A bit of advice for you mp3, red chrome deserves best answer for giving an intelligent  articulate answer

    i will never ever apologise for anything i have ever said about the Macscammies neither here nor in person

  3. ha ha ha ha HA !

    You must be joking. They will just start the vitriol all over again now. Regurgitating all they have spewed in the past.

    Rosebud already started very early this morning.

  4. You are joking, I see Mr S, as he now is, is back already just warming up with questions about his own view of the world. Wait until Kate and Gerry make their statement at 7, then it all starts.

  5. The most recent article I could find was four hours old and said only that the Portuguese government was planning to release their final report today, and the McCann's were hoping to be cleared.  I could not find where it had been released and the McCann's had been cleared.  Do you have a source?

  6. Well said Red C.

    The files have been shelved for now but will be re-opened if further evidence comes to light. The Mc's have nothing to celebrate, neither has anyone who deems it ok to neglect children. And nothing will diminish from the fact that the Mc's and their cronies  hindered the investigation with their never ending inconsistencies and refusal to help the Police, has proved that. The truth always comes out in the end and hopefully the sick 'charade' will be revealed for what it really is; for the forgotten one, Madeleine.

    Edit: Here here Red! Also Signed!!!!

  7. i agree.

  8. You obviously have information I am not privy to.

  9. Do pro-McCanns by their nature support child negligence?

    How are the pro-McCanns proved right - what evidence is there that poor little Maddie was abducted?

  10. Not at all. The McCanns do not occupy the moral high ground. What part of leaving 3 children under 5 in a flat on their own for a period of time unattended during which time Madeleine went "missing" is considered to be responsible parenting. I do not consider that responsible parenting.

    Apparently the investigation - if reports are to be understood -is "shelved" until further information comes to light and who knows what and when that might be.

    I look forward to Mr. Amaral's book.

  11. Not at all!!!!

    I think they are unique in being the only parents of a missing child that refused to answer police questions or cooperate with a re enactment!!!!

    Even strangers do not do that!!!

    All they have to do is agree to answer the questions and the case would be reopened immediately!!!

    Why do people concentrate on the parents and forget all about finding Maddie?!!!!

    Perhaps you know of a single case where the parents refused to help the police - if so please tell us!!!!

  12. Sorry, I don't understand, did the parents NOT go out and LEAVE their THREE BABIES UNATTENDED in the apartment for several nights on the trot????

    because if they didn't, then I take it all back.  But they DID!  so nothing has changed.

    The parents NEGLECTED their babies.

    End of.

  13. I think it is more likely that their detractors will simply stick to their guns and swear that the family have "bought off" the law/media etc.

  14. LOL the Antis apologising??

    never!!

  15. I wouldn't hold your breath, they will be busy dreaming up other questions to stir things ups again.

  16. The McNockers still can't seem to fathom the fact that the vast majority of the so-called "Pro McCann's", were, in fact, Pro-Justice and not necessarily Pro-McCann's per se. Those intelligent enough to actually digest what they read will understand this fundamental difference.

    Your question: That is a matter of personal choice.

  17. whatever your opinion of the mccanns

    we should all agree that leaving your kids alone in a hotel room on holiday in a foreign country shows incredible stupidity

  18. i disagree

    no one has been found guilty of her death or disappearance

    the allegations against the parents have not been proven or disproved

    i'd say it was a stand off

    but the truth may come out in the future - so it is a bit soon to celebrate the innocence of her parents

    i would think they would be eager to clear their name rather than have the cloud of suspicion in an unresolved case hanging over them

  19. Nobody has won - Madeleine has still not been found.

    At least now her parents can get on with trying to find out what happened to her and get on with their own lives with their remaining children, and Robert Murat can try to repair his shattered life and reputation.

    Their lives will be h**l anyway without Madeleine and they will have to live with the guilt that they weren't there to protect her.

    Nobody will make any apologies on this site - and they won't stop here either.  

    If there had been evidence enough to charge and try The McCanns I would have been the first to apologise - do people really think that as a "pro" I want people to get away with murder or manslaughter?  Of course I don't and I don't believe any other pros do either.  What I don't agree with is the nasty and libellous unsubstantiated s**t that has been flying about here and in the press over the past year.

  20. i am not pro McCann, but i find myself having to correct the people you mention because of their poisonous lies.......by the way most of them are the same person

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 20 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.