So Calzaghe barely beat a 43 year old fighter?

Question

is this the great UK champ? Had this fight happened 5 years ago Hopkins would have stopped the Brit

Answer 1

Ahh, yes. Before the fight you people said B-Hop couldn't lose, now he is too old uh?

Seems to me that your making excuses just like the executioner lol

He acted his butt off to buy himself some rest, but even that didn't help him. All he could do was clinch when he knew Joe was starting a big flurry. He literally dived at Joe to avoid being caught up in a flurry of fists. He lost, and he lost badly.

Lets just say Joe fights 20 year old Pavlik and loses. Are we then to come here just like you and say, "well joe was too old"?? What would you say to that??

Answer 2

43?  That's right! Lets see him beat someone well in their prime!

Answer 3

At the end of the day, Hopkins was the one with all the mouth and got his *** whooped. Maybe old-timer should have thought twice before he got in the ring with Joe. Ballet seems more his forte.

What an idiot, he makes racist statements about whites and then goes and gets a good hiding from one.

Answer 4

you know joe is 36 as well, he is also pretty old, i think rather about just how much more of a thrashing st. benard would have taken if JOE was in his prime

Answer 5

Here are some of your words of wisdom:

"Oh yea, Hopkins will take Joe to school... the old school."

"Joe will get Tito'ed tonight"

You didn't seem to think his age was a problem before so why the excuses now? Maybe you are as delusional as Bernard is. He actually thinks he won that fight.