So... What do you think about Ernests Gulbis?

Question

He's playing very well at Roland Garros, and I think he'll take the second set in a tiebreak. What about you?

Answer 1

He has a good serve and very nice game. He's a good player and if he was playing Federer or Ferrer he'd already be in the semis. Djokovic is incredibly poised under pressure from the challenge of Gulbis. He just won the second set  tiebreaker. Nole is on fire! Good match from both tho

Answer 2

I'm extremely sad to say he just lost it!!!

great player but I'm sooooooooo disappointed he had to lose two close sets:((

I hope he's not as disappointed as I am and continues fighting!! not easy though I'm just a viewer and my nerves are already a wreck!!

he's a pleasure to watch I'm even leaving the nadal match to watch him

Answer 3

He is just, incredible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I love his game, he is one of the players, who will be nr.1. Excellent play!

Answer 4

i think he definitely got a game to beat djokovic today.  he should have at least won a set from djokovic.

Answer 5

He played so well ~ big serves, good movement, and nice winners. The match against Djok was pretty close. Experience maybe was the big difference though. I think he will be at the top 20 sooner or later!

Answer 6

He's hot :) and he's done a good job so far, too bad he lost to Djokovic. But it was a close match though, so indeed we can say that he's a good player and if he continues to play like this, it's not impossible for him to be in the top 10.

go Ernests! :)

Answer 7

I wish he took that second set he played really well against Novak. Semi-final showdown now with Rafa!!! C`mon the birthday boy !!!

Vamos Rafa x*x

Answer 8

Gulbis is a great surprise. He really gave Djokovic a tough time. He was no pushover! We will be seeing more of this player; I'm sure of that. I love the way he plays.

Answer 9

great player with a great future. Should be a contender for majors in a year's time if he continues in the same way. And, should be no problem for him to get to the #4 ranking considering most above him till #4 (and especially #4) are undeserving of their rankings.