So what is better, to have no family values, or fail to achieve 100% of them?

Question

OK, nevermind your machinations. Anyone can be vague. Which is better?

Answer 1

Failing to achieve them and letting the government not dictate them to you.

Answer 2

Trying, but failing to achieve your values is much better than having no values.  

Answer 3

Making it look like its ok for your teenage doughter to get pregnant is definetly not better in my book.

Answer 4

I would say that either one is better than judging other people's values and what is going on in their private lives.

Before you point to the speck in someone else's eye, first pull than plank out of your own eye.

Answer 5

Wow what a question, I love it!!  And of course the answer must be to fail to achieve 100% of them.  Palin should use this tonight!!  Star for you.

Answer 6

I asked something similiar this morning.  The Lib answers to this one will be nothing but "Well, at least I don't push them on others......"  Same old tired rhetoric.

Answer 7

I think  you try to instill family values as best you can.  We can only give our children the tools to make their decisions.  It seems to me, that at the end of the day, regardless of how hard it was to make this decision, Palin's daughter made the hard decision, not the easy one.

Answer 8

well....since EVERY family goes through family value issues.....this is a trick question.

last i checked, nobodies perfect.

Answer 9

I just think before you start trying to force your values on a state or country it would be best to see if your own family can uphold them.

Answer 10

And your point is?  Your assumption is that everyone who disagrees with you has no family values.  This is incorrect.

Answer 11

Failing to "achieve" them is pretty close to "not having" them.