Solutions to global warming?

Question

what are some solutions to correct any problems associated with global warming?

Answer 1

There already IS a solution:

http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/...

Please note their solutions --- in the article.

Answer 2

Global Warming has simply become part of the political agenda and is the answer to all the problems in the world.

If something goes wrong we blame it on global warming.

People like to say there is no debate on global warming however NASA just recently showed that the warmest day ever was in 1938, that was BEFORE, the little Ice age scare of the 60's-80's

The earth is on a cycle and there is data to prove it. Simply stop listening to the media who only displays news if it has the "Scare" factor.

If it bleeds it leads and that is exactly the problem.

Do some research from many different sources and you will find your answer :)

Answer 3

Man doesn't cause Global Warming, and Man can't change it.

Answer 4

The solution is... STOP listening to Al Gore's CO2 blow hole make noise! Take away his sheets of paper and his pencil, it's killing way too many trees!

Answer 5

reduce CO2 emmisions that would help

Answer 6

Turn off our computers and just walk away

Answer 7

For the moment the only thing that's really worth doing is building nuclear power plants (with the exception of hydro and geothermal in the few places where they'll work and are cheaper than nuclear) because using anything more expensive than the cheapest low emissions technology is a waste of money and resources that could have been better spent on nuclear power (and it will require thousands of reactors to be built around the world over the next couple of decades so massive expansion will be needed).

Other types of power plant either won't actually solve the problem without major technological breakthrough (such as wind or ground based solar which need large scale energy storage technology we don't have otherwise they are incapable of replacing fossil fuels), will only work in limited locations (hydro and geothermal, though where they can work economics might dictate that they be built), or rely on technology we don't have and thus can't predict with enough accuracy to base cost estimates on (clean coal hasn't been done yet (and doesn't look like it'll be very good anyway), fusion will take a couple of decades (and I know they said that a couple of decades ago) and space solar power needs much better space infrastructure than what we have now).

While we're doing that we should also be researching a way to deal with transportation fuels which are the second biggest source of CO2 (and where we don't have a viable replacement for fossil fuels).  Synthetic hydrocarbons, hydrogen and improved battery technology need to be researched and we'll just have to hope one of them works out.

Answer 8

Faze out coal ,and go to anything else.

watch this video to realize how much energy falls on our roofs that we almost do not occupy

http://multiply.com/gi/ecowellness:video...

and Edward Mazria,also goes onto understandable detail why we must get away from coal

he calls this the silver bullet

Answer 9

Stop voting for liberals in any party especially democrats and stop voting for lawyers because most if not all of this mess is at least partly their fault. This will in time help solve the problem and enable a return to the constitutional methods the country was founded on instead of the democratic populist ones since imposed by wishful would be tyrants.

Answer 10

We should seize Al Gore's multi-kilo square foot mansion that consumes more energy than 20 average American homes, and use the money to further research into nuclear fusion technology.

Then we could seize Al Gore's boat, that burns more fuel per hour than four family sedans, and use the money to further clean coal technology.

We could also seize Al Gore's Gulfstream private jet that consumes more fuel flying one-way across the country than a Hummer consumes in an entire year, and use the savings to fund programs to make older homes more energy efficient.

Sounds like a good start to me.