Question:

Spurs and Lakers question?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

This two team in NBA west dominated since 1999 till 2007. Remember Lakers had 3peat 2000 till 2002 and Spurs had title 1999 and 2003. It means NBA west had 5yrs in a row NBA title run. I love Spurs, I love the rivalry between Lakers vs Spurs, I hope this game between LA vs SA gets bigger. Just like Boston vs Lakers. It will be great. 2teams dominated west are SA and LA no doubt.

Tim Duncan + Tony Parker + Manu Ginobili = Dynasty right now since 2003?

SHAQ + Kobe Bryant + Rick Foxx = Dynasty from 1999 till 2003

Am I right about this? if so explain me why, if not tell me about it.

Which two team in NBA final for next season.

I hope Spurs vs Boston.

Bye

 Tags:

   Report

8 ANSWERS


  1. i undertand where ur comin from man. I respect the spurs and know they are one h**l of a good team. I would love to see next year western conference finals between Lakers and SPurs. But in the the end I want Lakers vs Boston in finals, only i want lakers to win.


  2. i like both teams but if spurs  was awake when they faced the lakers in the west. finals they would of went to the nba finals an maybe make it to a game 7 with the celtics i go with SPurs

  3. What up K.O.,

    There is no doubt in this last decade- that the Spurs and Lakers have been the two top teams in the West- and it seems that the two teams have had some great series over the years.

    The Spurs window of opportunity is closing- but you can never count them out with the big 3.  It'd be nice to see another classic series between the two teams- but the West just seems to get better everyday--- i wouldn't be surprised to see these two teams square off for the West.

    And while i do not like the Spurs as a rival- i usually root for them in the Finals- since i try to root for the West over the East. Don't like you guys all that much- but go much respect for you.

    Nickster

  4. ok i see ya point but why rick fox

    why not fisher instead of freaking rick foxx

    but also i dont see a big rivalry with da 2 teams and it wont be Boston vs SA cause the spurs are still old but since 2003 the spurs won a championship every 2 years but i think it will be a

    Jazz vs Celtics finals

  5. Spurs-Lakers isn't even close to the rivalry of Lakers-Celtics and never will be. Also, I wouldn't consider the Spurs to still be a dynasty. And I agree with the other poster - Fisher deserves to be in that list over Fox.

    I do think Lakers-Spurs offer some interesting games but, like many others, San Antonio bores me to no end (nothing was worse than Spurs-Cavs finals). Also, Lakers-Spurs isn't even close to being the rivalry that Lakers-Kings is (anyone from LA or NorCal knows that).

    Oh, and no one KOs Cena.

  6. well ur hopes will be destroyed when kobe bynum oom and gasol kill duncan.

    remember they killed the spurs this year and nothins gonna change next year except a lakers sweep and an 08-09 championship banner

  7. I am a PROUD TEXAS resident and have been since a yungster, I now live in San Antonio and I've seen the sours play alot, and they're not that exciting but they will beat you down with that ol school plain a** basketball, and I'm not a Lakers fan but d**n Kobe can ball, and I love to see the Spurs Lakers games cause yes those 2 teams dominate to West and unless some other team can consistently compete with them then they're gonna continure to dominate. EVEN THOUGH I'M A MAVS FAN!!!!! GO MAVS GO!!!!!

  8. Lakers put an end to the Spurs last year!

    With Bynum in the Lakers line up next year the Spurs have zero chance of getting to the finals.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 8 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions