The ECB have announced that Sri Lanka are to replace Zimbabwe touring England in April and May 2009.
However, the dates of the tour clash with the IPL. If Sri Lanka's players come to England, they will only be able to play the first 10 days of the IPL.
As 13 of Sri Lanka's top players are signed up for the lucrative Indian tournament, the Sri Lankan board could face a huge problem if the players insist they wish to stay for the full tournament, rather than go to England.
The ECB are currently in discussions about how to resolve the issue.
So my question has two parts:
Should players choose the IPL over playing for their country?, and;
Why didn't the ECB think of this before inviting Sri Lanka?
Tags: